US FOMC Member Goolsbee Speaks

FED'S GOOLSBEE: SERVICES INFLATION ENCOURAGING TODAY; WOULD FEEL CONSIDERABLY MORE CONFIDENT IF PCE INFLATION MIRRORED CPI READINGS FOR SEVERAL CONSECUTIVE MONTHS CHI FED'S GOOLSBEE Q&A/KENOSHA: REPEATS, JOBS MARKET 'REMARKABLY STABLE WITHOUT BEING GOOD;' JOBS MKT NOT LEADING INDICATOR , POPULATION NOW KEY #Goolsbee #FederalReserve #economy

fed's goolsbee defends his dissent, says inflation remains well above target and moving in the wrong direction; adds the labor market is stable, services inflation is concerning, and more evidence is needed that price pressures are temporary.

In the past few years, I have highlighted the increase in productivity growth and the possibility that it could be a lasting phenomenon and a great boon to the economy. The implications for interest rates, though, remain an active area of debate. The economics suggest that the answer depends heavily on whether the productivity growth happens unexpectedly or is anticipated to be coming in the future. Some view the lesson of the 1990s in the United States to be that faster productivity growth can mean lower rates because it lowers inflation. At the time, then-U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan argued that productivity increases had to be behind the aggregate profit, employment, and inflation numbers, even though productivity growth itself had not yet materialized in the data. It was unexpected—and in that circumstance, the fundamentals call for lower rates. But if people expect an increase in productivity coming in the future, it can change their behavior today, making the rate picture more complicated. An increase in expected future income is just like a wealth increase today: It can lead to increased spending and potentially overheat the economy before the productivity boom has actually arrived. In that case, rates would likely need to rise. So it's critical we look out for activity driven by assumptions of future growth: stock market wealth effects on consumer spending, higher capital investment driven by market valuations, and so on. The bigger the hype about future productivity, the more rates may need to rise to prevent overheating. This could affect other countries, too, as the productivity gains or expected gains spread with the new technology across borders. And, importantly, facing a supply shock in the near term—whether from oil prices, disruptions to the supply chain, or other factors—makes the problem worse. Supply shocks reduce potential and limit growth for the economy, but they also make the problem of inflation from anticipated future productivity growth more extreme. According to Fed’s Goolsbee, the more markets expect productivity gains, the more monetary policy may need to tighten.

FED'S GOOLSBEE: IF YOU CUT RATES TOO MUCH, YOU IGNITE INFLATION MORE. ... Fed's Goolsbee; Inflation has got to be front of mind when Warsh starts as chair

FED'S GOOLSBEE: ~DON'T THINK FED INDEPENDENCE IS GOING AWAY FED'S GOOLSBEE: WITHOUT CENTRAL BANK INDEPENDENCE, INFLATION WILL COME ROARING BACK Fed's Goolsbee: CPI report tells us not much that's good. Fed's Goolsbee: Inflation is going the wrong way, not just in oil-related and tariff-related things.

Fed's Goolsbee: The April CPI report was worse than expected. GOOLSBEE: WORST PART OF APRIL CPI IS SERVICES INFLATION GOOLSBEE: WE HAVE AN INFLATION PROBLEM IN THIS COUNTRY

A year and a half ago, I gave a talk here in this very room for the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research (SIEPR), in which I argued that, although the productivity data are noisy, there had been an increase in the productivity growth rate. Some attributed this increase to one-time level shifts coming out of Covid or work-from-home, but I argued it looked to be tech/AI related and, if so, it might be sustained for several years. And I said then that if it did prove to be a sustained increase, it would make us richer, but ...