{quote} Well said mate, much respect... Even the heating (and cooling) of our planet is a cycle... hundreds of thousands of years it has been going.. My thoughts is that a part of that not thinking also loses focus on things that may be important... jr, you mention tuning the engines so they burn less and more efficiently... why the fk isn't the focus to take that further and take combustion engines to as close as full combustion as possible instead of going down the ev cycle to replace the technology that really helped make our world... energy...
Absoluty, also would like to add is that then when I listen an ecologist saing ''we are destroying the planet'', i laugh, it's the most condescendent and anoying phrase I ever listen, the humans don't have the power to crank the planet, and the planet don't give a blank about the ozone hole or the plastic straws
.The response that ecologists are trying to respond is how to aboid have an enviroment that humans cannot survive, not how to save the planet
.Ecology is just another multimillionary business, that brings to the response of the question , there is not interest in evolve the old tecnology because something more eficient means less sells. Also, what's more easy to sell, a brand new car with the tecnology of the ''future'' or an evolved and optimized version of the regular car? we all know the response, being said that don't forget that evolution and experience always beats design.
jr , Mr Sisucoro s old haunt the "uro" may hve plled a muscle tody alredy also, it finished wht it culdnt do lst wk and hit a prv wkly high , whch was also lst qtrs high
rip and tear until it's done
