Hold The Gold

Another quite complicated condition shows how buy's dominance grows behind the eye curtains...

A drop of nearly $210 generated 8 sells (nothing!) vs a $40 range, generating 9 buys?
I think, the daily average price to be quite important...

Hum...
Well, I'm detecting the middle range based on prices that already have been squared!
But is there a way to predict which prices will be squared next? Just for curiosity, not asking how...

Maybe the next step is just to make use of the extreemes of the detected range?? Is this what "verticals" is?

Going to a restaurant now with friends. Will watch your movies when going off to bed, Oliver.

Quoting Offujimori

Disliked

{quote} Hum... Well, I'm detecting the middle range based on prices that already have been squared!

Ignored

Almost perfect. I feel how you are detecting it. Don't explain anything here, please.

I could not find such way, but this is just me. Maybe you will? I hope you will. You were talking about these pivots, which noone can actually trade? Maybe this is your way?

Here is something. Look at the squared levels. Their boundries. You will see there are layers. But it was impossible for me to nail which layer will be next? Just check that direction? The layers? Maybe there is something there for you?


One way to get a verticle signal. Yes. But it is not the best method for verticals, as you are not including the time as a factor. Time is uber important factor. But a score is a score! Congrats on your first vertical!

Maybe mixing It with pivot data can show some data to measure probabillity of the next step, and then adjusting lots/entrances according to? I don't know. Very hard to do. But maybe there's something. Well, I will test it later...! I'm taking way too long to program now. Things are getting hard.
Loop inside loops. Almost like my past real account trading account negative results


I think I understood what you mean with "layers" at the boundries. I have to watch the squared levels developing in slow motion to check it!

{quote} One way to get a verticle signal. Yes. But it is not the best method for verticals, as you are not including the time as a factor. Time is uber important factor. But a score is a score! Congrats on your first vertical![/quote]

Humm... Time?! . hum....
I need some baths to process It now. My brain needs hot water stimulus. One day when I have a bathtub I'll use It like brainstorm time.
Maybe the hot water heatens my neural system out of freeze mode

So that's a type of vertical!!
CHEERS. SAKE CHEERS!

Gold = Swiss watch SPRING

She will go higher than NASA's rockets could possibly go?!?

Divergence on weekly chart, overbought on monthly chart. Day is consolidating for either resume uptrend or deep correction.

Quoting farukh

Disliked

Divergence on weekly chart, overbought on monthly chart. Day is consolidating for either resume uptrend or deep correction. https://youtu.be/QDBMbRq_b-w

Ignored

Probably. Still, as you described it, it will be just a correction... Trend is a trend. It does include all corrections within. Small and deep ones.

Well I started/building a position August 7th (NFP news) EURUSD only 0.01 lots 1M only. Missed tons of nice entries, flipped to early, forgot to bank positions(because all done manually) even was long on the drop eurusd during nfp, still made 300$ sofar atm zero Drawdown, max drawdown was below 100$. Still peanuts but with two fingers in the nose one pair 0.01 lots... not bad at all. Lot's to do/think but Thanks MZ!

Quoting Meyney

Disliked

Well I started/building a position August 7th (NFP news) EURUSD only 0.01 lots 1M only. Missed tons of nice entries, flipped to early, forgot to bank positions(because all done manually) even was long on the drop eurusd during nfp, still made 300$ sofar atm zero Drawdown, max drawdown was below 100$. Still peanuts but with two fingers in the nose one pair 0.01 lots... not bad at all. Lot's to do/think but Thanks MZ!

Ignored

Congratulations on positions hold!

My advice is, if you can lower down the number of entries. Significantly. Increase their average pip target to something very high? Don't sell yourself cheap!

Open very small number of trades. Target them very very high. This is unstopable. They can't hurt you.

If you screw it all up on the chosen direction? Even, if you just gamble it? The loss will still be minimal, because of the very few entries...

The problem with this strategy, is you won't get rich. Not until 15 years after you just started it.

Out of context. I have waited like 15 years for our business to deliver what it was built for in a first place. I can wait. But NOT twice in a lifetime. But if you have not get to what you want, YET? 15 years is just a regular waiting time...

Long term, this hidden accumulation of buys does not look good for the shorts...

This one is a very complicated special condition that repeats behind what is visible by the human eye. The number grows at the very same levels? Which in long term means only one thing... the blues will be highly respected!

[quote=MoneyZilla;13144382]This one is a very complicated special condition that repeats behind what is visible by the human eye.

Interesting and thanks MZ! I was building shorts-ready to flip on EURUSD and guess what it did...nice. This one was visible; you name it square I guess?

cheers M

Quoting Meyney

Disliked

This one is a very complicated special condition that repeats behind what is visible by the human eye. Interesting and thanks MZ! I was building shorts-ready to flip on EURUSD and guess what it did...nice. This one was visible; you name it square I guess? cheers M

Ignored

Not squares here. Long term trend seems very accurate with.

Squares are hard on the flips...

I often got lost in the proper 'direction'; sometimes suddenly my bias changed into the wrong way. Still I managed to make profit with the basket when wrong (?) thx to MZ keeping lots ultra small, no compounding, no SL. Next: 2 accounts, 2 'trends' etc.

Anyway this was my version of a flip...

Impressive, Meyney.

Meyney, I have mentioned to you, in the past, I do like ~400k net pips or so, per month, in some accounts, to deliver the quote, here is my Aug'20 result of one of my accounts (I add like 6 to 8 new each month). Took me 40 calendar days to close these (yesterday). Last before closure there were ~3,700 remaining baskets that could not reach to their targets. This is us cent live. Nearly ~650,000 net pips gained out of ~6,500 baskets, flat 0.01 lot each.

Meyney, I have mentioned to you, in the past, I do like ~400k net pips or so, per month, in some accounts, to deliver the quote, here is my Aug'20 result of one of my accounts (I add like 6 to 8 new each month). Took me 40 calendar days to close these (yesterday). Last before closure there were ~3,700 remaining baskets that could not reach to their targets. This is us cent live. Nearly ~650,000 net pips gained out of ~6,500 baskets, flat 0.01 lot each.

Now that's impressive!