Sorry, but this system was deleted by it's creator.
don't bother creating such a thread to get attention or get scrutinize for nothing, until you have that account done privately then link up for sharing.
So far, only a few statements i seen, have grow up to maybe lets say 100 to 20K? at most after gambling chances after chances maybe one day, it might happen during a breakout by adding with the trend. -> as many would add against the trend in red instead. -> still those are free account concept or really meant to use leverage.
Else, a normal trader's account like 10-20k, no one will gamble in that manner for 1000%++. The rule is quite simple, for every dollar to make , there's also a chance for every dollar to be lost unless one refined it via their own system through rm, mm and selective entries with higher probability of running a winner and cutting losers short. Else its quite a fat hope.
The attached is a system i seen by a trader trading like 1-2 trades per day, sometimes 3 using a 1:2 common and sometimes 1:3 RR.
For a system to be successful, a trader ought to take losses through stop losses or hedge them if not using stop loss. Else, an example of 10 pip take profit for a 100 pip stop loss is just a matter of time, the whole trading account will be doomed unless ur trading really a consolidated pairs that does not breakout at all.
A system have no real dd if it does not implement stop losses, because its quite a matter of time the whole account will thread even further in dd. Where as a Risk per bet set up defined a stop loss, like 0.5% per trade/day for 1% reward strictly, compared to trading in a buffering DD.
don't bother creating such a thread to get attention or get scrutinize for nothing, until you have that account done privately then link up for sharing.
So far, only a few statements i seen, have grow up to maybe lets say 100 to 20K? at most after gambling chances after chances maybe one day, it might happen during a breakout by adding with the trend. -> as many would add against the trend in red instead. -> still those are free account concept or really meant to use leverage.
Else, a normal trader's account like 10-20k, no one will gamble in that manner for 1000%++. The rule is quite simple, for every dollar to make , there's also a chance for every dollar to be lost unless one refined it via their own system through rm, mm and selective entries with higher probability of running a winner and cutting losers short. Else its quite a fat hope.
The attached is a system i seen by a trader trading like 1-2 trades per day, sometimes 3 using a 1:2 common and sometimes 1:3 RR.
For a system to be successful, a trader ought to take losses through stop losses or hedge them if not using stop loss. Else, an example of 10 pip take profit for a 100 pip stop loss is just a matter of time, the whole trading account will be doomed unless ur trading really a consolidated pairs that does not breakout at all.
A system have no real dd if it does not implement stop losses, because its quite a matter of time the whole account will thread even further in dd. Where as a Risk per bet set up defined a stop loss, like 0.5% per trade/day for 1% reward strictly, compared to trading in a buffering DD.
QuoteDislikedNo one can make every trade a winner. only guru makes them, but eventually blows their account