I'm glad you like it I'll be sure to let the programmers know. We also have a new tablet version of the FXCM Trading Station for the iPad and Android tablets, if you haven't already seen it: www.fxcm.com/fxcm-mobile-forex.jsp
Jason
- #2,921
- Aug 1, 2012 2:43pm Aug 1, 2012 2:43pm
- Joined Jun 2009 | Status: FXCM Representative | 5,808 Posts
- #2,922
- Aug 3, 2012 5:43pm Aug 3, 2012 5:43pm
- Joined Jun 2009 | Status: FXCM Representative | 5,808 Posts
- #2,925
- Aug 6, 2012 11:07am Aug 6, 2012 11:07am
- Joined Jun 2009 | Status: FXCM Representative | 5,808 Posts
- #2,926
- Aug 6, 2012 11:39am Aug 6, 2012 11:39am
- Joined Jun 2009 | Status: FXCM Representative | 5,808 Posts
- #2,929
- Aug 7, 2012 3:39am Aug 7, 2012 3:39am
- Joined Sep 2010 | Status: Life Time Member | 6,685 Posts
- #2,931
- Aug 7, 2012 6:04am Aug 7, 2012 6:04am
- | Joined Jul 2012 | Status: Trader | 1,036 Posts
So, you think you have rights? LOL
- #2,933
- Aug 7, 2012 6:14pm Aug 7, 2012 6:14pm
LOL!! Stumbled across article the descibes EXACTLY some of the stuff I experienced with them. Prob a lot of it (as much as they can get away with) is still going on. 
http://forexmagnates.com/full-detail...s-action-suit/
a. Slow Server Command: When a customer is engaged in profitable trading activity, Defendant routes the customer’s account to a “slow server,” causing trade execution to be slowed down, and allowing Defendant the time to hijack any potential profit in the trade by buying and selling in-between the customer’s order and the real market, with Defendant’s taking any profit and leaving the customer victimized with no money for his or her effort;
b. False “Error” Messages: Defendant uses its administrative back-end software to prevent the customer from closing out a profitable trade and instead causes the trading system to generate any one of a series of “error” messages to the customer, blocking the customer’s efforts to finalize what would have been a profitable order;
c. Flash Trades: Defendant, in a practice known as “stop hunting,” manipulates the market price of the traded currency, including printing bogus “flash trades” which move the “market” to trigger the customer’s stop order for a given trade, essentially closing the customer out of that trade;
d. Arbitrary Margin Rules: Defendant arbitrarily changes the margin rules on Fridays for an ensuing week without any notice to the customer, which results in the customer’s being deprived of any trading advantages or leverage opportunities they may have, and again causing the customer’s account to be closed out in favor of Defendant;
e. Abuse of “Slippage”: Defendant, in a practice known as “slipping a trade,” takes advantage of “slippage” in a given trade. “Slippage” is the change in price between the time when a price is quoted and a market order is placed. It is customarily caused by market movement while the trade is being executed. The incidence of “slippage” should roughly be equal in favor of the customer and the broker. Defying all laws of probability, in almost every case, Defendant’s customers suffer losses as a result of “slippage” at grossly greater percentages than Defendant does, which can only be explained by Defendant’s manipulation of pricing; and
“Slow Fill” and “No Fill” Commands: Defendant often fails to execute valid and profitable trade orders entered by the customer and instead causes the trading system to generate a “slow fill” or “no fill” message to the customer as the customer attempts to close out a profitable trade, preventing the customer from making a profit while generating illicit profits for Defendant.
http://forexmagnates.com/full-detail...s-action-suit/
a. Slow Server Command: When a customer is engaged in profitable trading activity, Defendant routes the customer’s account to a “slow server,” causing trade execution to be slowed down, and allowing Defendant the time to hijack any potential profit in the trade by buying and selling in-between the customer’s order and the real market, with Defendant’s taking any profit and leaving the customer victimized with no money for his or her effort;
b. False “Error” Messages: Defendant uses its administrative back-end software to prevent the customer from closing out a profitable trade and instead causes the trading system to generate any one of a series of “error” messages to the customer, blocking the customer’s efforts to finalize what would have been a profitable order;
c. Flash Trades: Defendant, in a practice known as “stop hunting,” manipulates the market price of the traded currency, including printing bogus “flash trades” which move the “market” to trigger the customer’s stop order for a given trade, essentially closing the customer out of that trade;
d. Arbitrary Margin Rules: Defendant arbitrarily changes the margin rules on Fridays for an ensuing week without any notice to the customer, which results in the customer’s being deprived of any trading advantages or leverage opportunities they may have, and again causing the customer’s account to be closed out in favor of Defendant;
e. Abuse of “Slippage”: Defendant, in a practice known as “slipping a trade,” takes advantage of “slippage” in a given trade. “Slippage” is the change in price between the time when a price is quoted and a market order is placed. It is customarily caused by market movement while the trade is being executed. The incidence of “slippage” should roughly be equal in favor of the customer and the broker. Defying all laws of probability, in almost every case, Defendant’s customers suffer losses as a result of “slippage” at grossly greater percentages than Defendant does, which can only be explained by Defendant’s manipulation of pricing; and
“Slow Fill” and “No Fill” Commands: Defendant often fails to execute valid and profitable trade orders entered by the customer and instead causes the trading system to generate a “slow fill” or “no fill” message to the customer as the customer attempts to close out a profitable trade, preventing the customer from making a profit while generating illicit profits for Defendant.
- #2,935
- Aug 7, 2012 6:56pm Aug 7, 2012 6:56pm
- | Membership Revoked | Joined Aug 2006 | 11,977 Posts
LOL!! Stumbled across article the descibes EXACTLY some of the stuff I experienced with them. Prob a lot of it (as much as they can get away with) is still going on.
http://forexmagnates.com/full-detail...s-action-suit/
a. Slow Server Command: When a customer is engaged in profitable trading activity, Defendant routes the customer’s account to a “slow server,” causing trade execution to be slowed down, and allowing Defendant the time to hijack any potential profit in the trade by buying and selling in-between...
Easier to blame someone else for your losses than yourself, while losing $150,000 did he not think to himself, hey my broker just cost me a trade I think I'll go elsewhere ?? I sure as hell would.
Before NDD they where average, since making the switch 100% perfect here with 1000's of trades and not once have I seen any of the above.
Slippage, it generally slips against me, but I'm generally buying when it's going up, so ofcourse it'll slip against me normally just starting to turn up and accelerating so yep that's normal. I do have it slip for me at times.
Flash Trades, this is Stop hunting, it's not the broker doing it, compare all brokers charts they are 99.99% the same, your SL got hit by every broker, cause the big players are fully aware there will be SL's they can hit there, which is basically extra sales for them to scoop up cheap.
Nothing to it, but to do it!!! Stick to the plan FOOL!!!!
- #2,936
- Aug 7, 2012 7:03pm Aug 7, 2012 7:03pm
- | Membership Revoked | Joined Aug 2006 | 11,977 Posts
Nothing to it, but to do it!!! Stick to the plan FOOL!!!!
- #2,939
- Aug 8, 2012 10:22am Aug 8, 2012 10:22am
- Joined Jun 2009 | Status: FXCM Representative | 5,808 Posts
- #2,940
- Aug 8, 2012 10:24am Aug 8, 2012 10:24am
- Joined Jun 2009 | Status: FXCM Representative | 5,808 Posts