CHEETAH Trading (100%+ per trade or up to 500% or more)
) with this or not (aka wait a little more)... but no more testing now... Just POURING money on the opportunity and waiting for the PANCAKE (with lots of fill) 
.
, It was close to n=6) alert, exception signal, eurusd buy!
BTW liquidity still crap atm... So it was rather good harvest AND extraordinary clean... much better than I would have hoped for! Hope it can be repeated a few times in a row... I mean at so clean signals... we would only need less than n=5 to get from 250USD to 1mio+... think about it! In fact 250USD to 4mio+ in 5 steps (n=5) 
{quote} Just idea... I noticed with backtesting my n EAs that there is some statistic that maybe can be used to pick up the winning trades. So statistic in combination with fundamentals. Idea is simple - run on demo account an EAs for various strategies (does not matter what indicator for entries etc but maybe oscillators or Bollinger bands). What we need is if go with SL lets say 30 and TP 30 then we get a series of wins and series of looses and win rate will be about 48% - 52%.. If we take SL40 and TP30 then win rate about 60%. So what we are...
Or in another way... leave some BLANKS... for example if we see the pattern that after n=5 wins (+++++), there might be some 7 loses (-------), we might count that in.... So yeah, I think the START now, since it is manual strategy more or less... for the ENTRY.. with the help of the price-prediction model of course, but let's leave that for now... ATm the outcome is important and then to see what TP/SL/LEVERAGE parameters would seem to bring the most overall profit... and secondly.. if there is any pattern among winning/losing trials... If you have checked the previous post you could see that we got pretty high "n" wise... specially if we adjusted SL a bit... Also some TPs were much under-harvested... But the big question now is how many times in a row can we repeat/strike this high "n" of wins, at certain parameters.. and what is the occurrence, or in other words... how many losing trials before the winning streak that might REPAY even the losing strikes.. Hope you get some answer/idea now You are most welcome to help us, even if only in STAT... this would be vital! I will now see in private and when the time is right, will launch this n=12 trial(s) and from those you could help us 2 things... optimise TP/SL/leverage levels... (just manually changing parameters to see which setup would bring most profit) and secondly.. what "n", how high.. to strike for... considering the miss-fires also... So for example... I would much rather strike for n=5s... if there would be like 2-3 loses in between them... and that his pattern would appear rather frequent.. than to wait for n=7 with many many (unpredictable) fails that would lose steam before reaching n=7 once in god know what time.. trials...
{quote} Interesting out of the box thinking
That would be ideal, for all to get something out of this, permanently.. that is why I much prefer this kind of discussion to just posting signals (by me only)... Aside of that n=12, as mentioned... So yeah, let's discuss this and when the green-light for this n=12 trial... goes GREEN.. We do it, attack.. and measure, stat analyse... along the way on how to optimise the trades.. or even find out that n=3-5 or n=5-7 would be better overall than to searching for n=12... that might happen too rare... if at all 
here are some statistics with GBPUSD breakout of the previous 3 days high/lows. 3 years of precise historical data (true ticks from Admiral Markets). Leverage 1:500, seems it's STP broker. Don't know where to get ECN broker with leverage more than 1:300 ? If we run the same EA on different broker then completely different results (worse). So in 3 years were 2 periods where n>6 {image} Here are detailed stats seems better to focus on n=5 or n=6 because in 3 years period where 6-7 such intervals: {image} When run backtest from 2018.10.30 till 2018.12.15...
If converted to same level it would after 8trades.. you would get ideal/equivalent n=6 (https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1000*2%5E6) out of n=12 aimed for So it shows that people much prefer (it seems) SPEED to STAMINA
Yes Please. The real DOG. SlumCHEETAH Billionaire{quote} There would be less than 63 trials. Because we start hunting for n=8 after 1 loose. If we are hunting for n=6 then we would get it 6 times in 3 years period. We would have 57 missed tries and 6 won. So -57000 USD in looses and 6*64000 = 384000 USD profit. Our total balance would be 384000 - 64000 = 327000 USD in 3 years. That's if you know a broker where to get full positions.. (at least STP broker) So how big starting capital we need for hunting? Lets say 57/6 = 9 * 1000 = 9000 USD and maybe 2x more just in case... and yes.. after 1st n=6...
And you EXPANDed correctly beyond this "how much we need to recover" after a loss, because we RE-DEPOSIT and "CHEET" this PROFIT needed to recover after BIG loss... Those stats of yours are based on your EA - Expert Advisor? How is it structured, in essence, if it is not a secret, if it is, then don't tell, we do not need to know anyway, the important are the results Just asking to see if there is room for improvement... Do not worry about full position, we can work with what they allow.. It is important that 500:1 is available and that max position is as big is it can be... tested some and it seems ok... Not full positions but close enough for now... As our game expands, we can customise everything basically.. and even if not, it would be just fine... the important is the "n"s... I have first-handedly tested... You can see in example TEs how many pips one should have to harvest 100%/trade... at certain market/leverage/broker...Above are the FULL examples exactly for this person.. To see the BALANCE, TRADE size, leverage, return, and what price difference is needed for WTI or GOLD in order to get 100%+/trade...
