"This strategy works best in range - avoid trends."
"This method thrives in trends but fails in range."
How many times have we heard this?
I don't want a strategy that works in a range but fails miserably when a trend comes.
In the same grain I don't want a strategy that works in a trend but ping pongs around in a range.
Why can't we have the best of both worlds? Of course we want the best of both worlds!
Surely someone has come up with a viable enough strategy to do this - either manually or through an automated EA.
But of course, a strategy that works in both ranging markets and trending markets may well be a strategy that thrives in one but merely survives in the other.
For the purpose of discussion, let's be open-minded and take all definitions.
I challenge everyone here to think deeper about how the best ranging strategies and trending strategies could come together in unison.
"This method thrives in trends but fails in range."
How many times have we heard this?
I don't want a strategy that works in a range but fails miserably when a trend comes.
In the same grain I don't want a strategy that works in a trend but ping pongs around in a range.
Why can't we have the best of both worlds? Of course we want the best of both worlds!
Surely someone has come up with a viable enough strategy to do this - either manually or through an automated EA.
But of course, a strategy that works in both ranging markets and trending markets may well be a strategy that thrives in one but merely survives in the other.
For the purpose of discussion, let's be open-minded and take all definitions.
I challenge everyone here to think deeper about how the best ranging strategies and trending strategies could come together in unison.