Nova Volume Trading System | Page 132 | Metals Mine

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Related Instruments

Gold/USD

Similar Threads

Please suggest a simple & effective Method/System of "Trading System" Forum to newbie 182 replies

HYBRID: trading system within a trading system 31 replies

Trapping System: Way to Fully-Automated Trading System 47 replies

Indicators:SuperNova !!! and Nova! 2 replies

Terra Nova Trading ECN 1 reply

Attachments: Nova Volume Trading System
Exit Attachments

Nova Volume Trading System

  • #2,621
  • May 18, 2026 4:38pm May 18, 2026 4:38pm
Nothing wrong with 1R profit for the day guys

Nova for sure can give a lot but 1R is still very very good!
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink
  • #2,622
  • May 19, 2026 12:09am May 19, 2026 12:09am
Quoting Toli84
I'm not sure if my analysis was correct. So i saw the price made a curve, like a bow - went up and down again. I switched to the 5M timeframe and looked left. I saw that there was an imbalance. Switched to 15M and saw even a bigger imbalance at the same place. So that means the price came into this imbalances to touch it. Thats why that bow curve i thought. After that touch, the price went through the EMAs and nova said yes. The second trade was a miss. Don't know why yet - maybe someone see why it was a bad take? So 1R today . I'm taking...
I liked your first entry....text book stuff, the ema's flipping after a squeeze. Your second trade the 3 LH and LL's might have kept me out but...hey hindsight is easy
Its all just one persons opinion
  • #2,623
  • May 19, 2026 12:34am May 19, 2026 12:34am
Quoting Toli84
I'm not sure if my analysis was correct. So i saw the price made a curve, like a bow - went up and down again. I switched to the 5M timeframe and looked left. I saw that there was an imbalance. Switched to 15M and saw even a bigger imbalance at the same place. So that means the price came into this imbalances to touch it. Thats why that bow curve i thought. After that touch, the price went through the EMAs and nova said yes. The second trade was a miss. Don't know why yet - maybe someone see why it was a bad take? So 1R today . I'm taking...
First of all, thank you for your courage and honest explanation. In fact, even though your first transaction entry does not exactly comply with the NOVA rules (I think the EMA intersections are not completely clear), it is nice that it results in a profit by contributing to the upper time frame confirmations. In the second transaction, there is no problem in entering the transaction in your current time period. It complies with all the rules. If you include the upper time confirmation, you will see that it touches the fvg at 5 m in the second process. Of course, this is my thought when the graph was created. Therefore, when we look at it in general, your transaction that complies with NOVA rules is SL, and when you add the upper time frame to the interpretation, the transaction you receive without the full ema intersection becomes TP. So there is a contradiction. For myself, for this reason, I do not include different time periods in the process. I try to do whatever the system gives me during the time period in which I trade. I hope I could explain it in correct sentences. I wish you profitable transactions.
  • #2,624
  • May 19, 2026 12:43am May 19, 2026 12:43am
Quoting tradernoname
{quote} . In fact, even though your first transaction entry does not exactly comply with the NOVA rules (I think the EMA intersections are not completely clear),
Hi trader, can you elaborate as to why the first transaction does not meet nova rules? thanks
Its all just one persons opinion
  • #2,625
  • May 19, 2026 12:58am May 19, 2026 12:58am
Quoting axecap
{quote} Hi trader, can you elaborate as to why the first transaction does not meet nova rules? thanks
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.webp Size: 8 KB


I mentioned it in my description. If the price is above 200 ema, we can think that the trend may turn up. But one of the main rules (xwisitk2001 please correct me if I'm wrong) was that there were ema intersections. If I'm not mistaken, the emas did not show an exact upward intersection in the transaction entry candle. That's why I meant exactly NOVA rule is not completed
  • #2,626
  • May 19, 2026 1:22am May 19, 2026 1:22am
Quoting tradernoname
{quote} {image} I mentioned it in my description. If the price is above 200 ema, we can think that the trend may turn up. But one of the main rules (xwisitk2001 please correct me if I'm wrong) was that there were ema intersections. If I'm not mistaken, the emas did not show an exact upward intersection in the transaction entry candle. That's why I meant exactly NOVA rule is not completed
Thanks for clarifying if i understand correctly by intersection you mean its the angle of the ema's thats not right? Its subjective but yes could be better. iIwould certainly have taken the trade. Also the "rules" of nova clearly refer to M15 corrrelation, which is not really subjective but you dismiss that? Dont get me wrong you are clearly comitted and trading nova and helping others, I just think some nova "rules" are a bit subjective and others are more integral to the method. Not questioning your success, the system allows for different styles and emphasis, but relying solely on m1 and not considering higher time frames can be dangerous depending on experience
Its all just one persons opinion
  • #2,627
  • May 19, 2026 2:05am May 19, 2026 2:05am
Quoting axecap
{quote} Thanks for clarifying if i understand correctly by intersection you mean its the angle of the ema's thats not right? Its subjective but yes could be better. iIwould certainly have taken the trade. Also the "rules" of nova clearly refer to M15 corrrelation, which is not really subjective but you dismiss that? Dont get me wrong you are clearly comitted and trading nova and helping others, I just think some nova "rules" are a bit subjective and others are more integral to the method. Not questioning your success, the system allows for different...
Yes, the ema intersections are not completed, that is, 50 did not cross the 100 ema above, and 100 did not cross the 200 ema above. However, if the price is above 200 ema, it can be interpreted that the trend will go up and the transaction can be taken according to the trading character of the person. There is no problem with this. I wanted to express my opinion based on my own trading style and opinion. You would enter into the transaction, but I would not enter into this transaction. This is what I meant.
  • #2,628
  • May 19, 2026 3:42am May 19, 2026 3:42am
thank you both for your thoughts, axecap and tradernoname!!! Every bit helps!
I see also why the second was a mistake: In that area where i entered was last Friday a lower high (London High). So it turned to an resistance. It's still didn't break through. Should have look more left and mark it as previous day high.
And ye the first one was a bit risky.
  • #2,629
  • May 20, 2026 7:46am May 20, 2026 7:46am
Today, I could only see one transaction opportunity. The important thing is that it is a correct and profitable transaction rather than multiple transactions. I would expect you, who are following the sharing process, to share the process and exchange ideas, but I see that I don't see anyone sharing much other than me. For this reason, it doesn't matter if I share on my own. I hope everyone is getting profitable transactions as they wish.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: XAUUSD_2026-05-20_15-47-21_fbc23.png Size: 63 KB
  • #2,630
  • May 20, 2026 7:54am May 20, 2026 7:54am
Good morning, first of all thank you xkwisit2001 for the initiative, I'm starting my studies and enjoying them very much. I'm going to post this trade and I'd like to know if it's correct.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.webp Size: 69 KB
  • #2,631
  • May 20, 2026 7:57am May 20, 2026 7:57am
Quoting tradernoname
Today, I could only see one transaction opportunity. The important thing is that it is a correct and profitable transaction rather than multiple transactions. I would expect you, who are following the sharing process, to share the process and exchange ideas, but I see that I don't see anyone sharing much other than me. For this reason, it doesn't matter if I share on my own. I hope everyone is getting profitable transactions as they wish.{image}
Keep sharing, I'm following and studying through your trades. Thank you.
  • #2,632
  • May 20, 2026 8:04am May 20, 2026 8:04am
Quoting ferjptrader
Good morning, first of all thank you xkwisit2001 for the initiative, I'm starting my studies and enjoying them very much. I'm going to post this trade and I'd like to know if it's correct. {image}
An entry that complies with NOVA rules. Congratulations
  • #2,633
  • May 20, 2026 8:16am May 20, 2026 8:16am
Quoting ferjptrader
Good morning, first of all thank you xkwisit2001 for the initiative, I'm starting my studies and enjoying them very much. I'm going to post this trade and I'd like to know if it's correct. {image}
Yes that is correct

One thing you'll notice is that more often than not your entry can often be a support in an uptrend because the entry usually comes after a surge of volume and thus leaves an imbalance behind.

I see this many many times which is why I do mention imbalances but I dont like candles that leave massive imbalances as they're highly like going to be filled anyway and makes the risk to reward even higher

Keep up with the good work
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink
  • #2,634
  • May 20, 2026 8:19am May 20, 2026 8:19am
Quoting tradernoname
Today, I could only see one transaction opportunity. The important thing is that it is a correct and profitable transaction rather than multiple transactions. I would expect you, who are following the sharing process, to share the process and exchange ideas, but I see that I don't see anyone sharing much other than me. For this reason, it doesn't matter if I share on my own. I hope everyone is getting profitable transactions as they wish.{image}
I think you're helping a lot of people here, I notice a lot of people will be reading but don't post.

This is normal, a lot of people that post usually do once they have digested the information first... but I appreciate your input and everyone else on here as well that keep Nova alive.

It doesn't need to be super busy here but there is a vast amount of information for people here now to help you become profitable.

I'm just very glad you understand and that you are showing how good the system is by following the rules mechanically.

Thanks again!
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink
  • #2,635
  • May 20, 2026 8:21am May 20, 2026 8:21am
I know Nova isn't all fancy and in the grand scheme of things it's very very simple. But that is what helps you become profitable...

Anything that makes you think too much is just going to make you unprofitable so know exactly when to enter and exit is the best thing you could ever have without needing all the extra technicals that cause analysis paralysis.

Wish you all green pips!
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink
  • #2,636
  • May 20, 2026 8:43am May 20, 2026 8:43am
I know I've been fairly light on posting my charts etc... I have been doing soooo much lately but I will return with insights
You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink
  • #2,637
  • May 20, 2026 8:49am May 20, 2026 8:49am
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Schermafbeelding 2026-05-20 154725.png Size: 71 KB

i believe this was a valid one too
  • #2,638
  • May 20, 2026 9:13am May 20, 2026 9:13am
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Schermafbeelding 2026-05-20 160648.png Size: 64 KB

and what about these 2; for me they are both valid entries, signal line crossing its 0-line from below, background nova confirming, ema's are lined up, price close to the ema50, HH's, HL's. What else, what am i missing?
  • #2,639
  • May 20, 2026 9:29am May 20, 2026 9:29am
Quoting huskyboy
{image} and what about these 2; for me they are both valid entries, signal line crossing its 0-line from below, background nova confirming, ema's are lined up, price close to the ema50, HH's, HL's. What else, what am i missing?
Examples of correct entries according to the rules. You know that not every transaction results in TP. We can say that this is the irony of this process. In my opinion, this is a correct entry example that results in SL.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: XAUUSD_2026-05-20_17-30-00_baebb.png Size: 68 KB
  • #2,640
  • May 20, 2026 9:33am May 20, 2026 9:33am
Quoting huskyboy
{image} i believe this was a valid one too
In my opinion, I would not enter into this process. I did not enter it anyway. Because I need to be convinced that the signal line has fallen below zero and the price has retreated. But just like the other examples, they also resulted in sl
4 traders viewing now