- Comments / Top
- Subscribe
bluesteele
Feb 11, 2026 6:10pm
Permalink
DwnUndrTrdr
Feb 11, 2026 9:11pm
Permalink
Trader#6691
Feb 11, 2026 6:40pm
Permalink
mbefus
Feb 11, 2026 6:46pm
Permalink
Trader#2200
Feb 11, 2026 5:31pm
Permalink
Trader#870C
Feb 11, 2026 8:33pm
Permalink
Trader#2200
Feb 11, 2026 6:14pm
Permalink
-
Related Stories
Trump: We just hit the highest price in stock market history. TRUMP: I'M NOT A BIG FAN OF THOSE CRAZY, CHINA-MADE WINDMILLS. ... TRUMP: COAL IS THE MOST DEPENDABLE FORM OF ENERGY WE HAVE. ... TRUMP SAYS HE IS DIRECTING THE DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY TO ISSUE FUNDS TO COAL PLANTS IN STATES INCLUDING WEST VIRGINIA AND OHIO TRUMP: THE TRADE DEFICIT HAS GONE DOWN 78% BECAUSE OF TARIFFS. ...
The House voted Wednesday to slap back President Donald Trumps tariffs on Canada, a rare if largely symbolic rebuke of the White House agenda as Republicans joined Democrats over the objections of GOP leadership. The tally, 219-211, was among the first times the House, controlled by Republicans, has confronted the president over a signature policy, and ...
MAJORITY OF U.S. HOUSE BACKS RESOLUTION TO END TRUMPS CANADA TARIFFS; VOTING CONTINUES U.S. HOUSE APPROVES RESOLUTION TO END TRUMPS CANADA TARIFFS BY 219211 ...
US House passes 219211 resolution to end Trumps Canada tariffs (there is a but ...) The U.S. House of Representatives voted 219211 to pass a resolution seeking to terminate former President Donald Trumps tariffs on Canada, marking a rare bipartisan rebuke of executive trade authority. The resolution, introduced by Representative Gregory Meeks, aims to end the national emergency declaration that provides the legal basis for the Canada tariffs. Six Republicans joined Democrats in voting yes, while one Democrat opposed the measure. The tariffs were imposed under emergency powers authorities, a legal pathway that allows a president to restrict trade on national security grounds. Critics argue this approach sidelines Congresss constitutional authority over trade policy and stretches the definition of national emergency. However, the House vote alone does not immediately lift the tariffs. For the resolution to take effect, it must also pass the U.S. Senate. Even if approved there, it would then require presidential signature, or, if vetoed, a two-thirds majority in both chambers to override. Given Republican support for Trumps trade strategy and the high bar required for a veto override, the resolution faces significant hurdles. Politically, the vote puts members on record ahead of broader trade debates and signals unease among some Republicans about the economic impact of tariffs, particularly on cross-border supply chains and consumer prices. The move could also increase pressure on the Senate to take up the measure, though its path forward remains uncertain. For markets, the vote is more a political signal than an immediate policy shift but it underscores that congressional scrutiny of executive tariff powers is intensifying.