Trump floats new tariffs in push to acquire Greenland | Metals Mine

  • Trump floats new tariffs in push to acquire Greenland

    From cnbc.com

    President Donald Trump said Friday he may impose tariffs on countries “if they don’t go along with Greenland.” “We need Greenland for national security. So I may do that,” Trump said at the White House. The comments show Trump, whose push to acquire Greenland for the U.S. has grown increasingly aggressive in recent months, turning to one of his favorite tools for leveraging power over foreign nations. The White House did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for additional information on Trump’s remarks. The Trump administration has previously said it is weighing multiple options, including ... (full story)

Comment Options
LightchaserG
Jan 16, 2026 11:09am
Permalink
What is wrong with this guy!? mental job.
Reply
Dutchy Daxy
Jan 16, 2026 11:11pm
Permalink
Quoting Trader#6FE9
They need to agree to sell it. The US could pay every human there a large amount of cash, and Denmark hundreds of billions. Or the US leaves NATO and the entire EU is in serious jeopardy. All you people from the EU trying to act tough is just nonsense, do your research on actual military fighting ability. Is one ice island with a small number of people worth risking all of Europe? Just get off your ego trip and sell it.
Thats all you Americans care about. Fighting power and money.

Americans think they can pay off everybody with a bag of money. They should care more about their countries credit card, which is filled/supported with a lot of foreign money.

Pay Denmark hundreds of billons $$ ? Let the money printer roll again.

That Green(Ice)land has already US militairy basis and with normal diplomacy it could be doubled/trippled if the US is so affraid for the safety of the Greenlanders by a China/Russia invasion.

After that said: Its not about "protection" here. Its about minerals to enrich the power/money hungry US.

Suddenly the US feels the heat of China, who has a much longer term plan than the US ever had, which changes its plans every week on every Trump fart.

Its time you should do your research and open your MAGA eyes.
Reply
Jr123
Jan 16, 2026 11:29am
Permalink
The U.S. is about to lose trade with half the countries in the world. I hope Greenland is worth it because frozen minerals are very expensive to mine.
Reply
mz8893
Jan 16, 2026 11:18am
Permalink
Can a orange turd have a mind even ?
Reply
Polimini
Jan 17, 2026 9:54am
Permalink
Quoting Riziq-Cap
{quote} How is China a threat to world peace? Never invaded a country, 1 foreign military base in Djibouti to protect its shipping lanes through the red sea/suez canal, builds infrastructure around the world, provide loans at better terms than IMF/WB, strengthen institutions of countries they trade with, never couped a country, their press is objective and dont ferment unrest , follows International law to the dot, weapons and tech they sell have no conditions or kill-switch, provides the world with cheap products. Even historically, China have...
godamnit, why do you guys do this?

What about Tibete? the shit with the Yugurs and the education camps, Hong Kong and how they just didn't respect the agreement they had with the British
Reply
Niru
Jan 16, 2026 5:50pm
Permalink
Quoting Trader#4E19
{quote} Not a single one of your posts is coherent, properly formatted, proper English, intelligent, or relevant. Every post you make shows how uneducated and uninformed you are. Of course people are allowed to post as they wish, but you are an unmitigated embarrassment.
No, perfectly coherent, perfectly relevant. Maybe for a dense little maga zombie like you, it is too difficult to understand, but there is nothing we can do about that now. An easy way to tell that you are an absolute twat is that you try so hard to make yourself sound intelligent by the language you use, however, you fail at that, too. What a clown haha
Niru
Jan 16, 2026 8:18pm
Permalink
Quoting Trader#6FE9
They need to agree to sell it. The US could pay every human there a large amount of cash, and Denmark hundreds of billions. Or the US leaves NATO and the entire EU is in serious jeopardy. All you people from the EU trying to act tough is just nonsense, do your research on actual military fighting ability. Is one ice island with a small number of people worth risking all of Europe? Just get off your ego trip and sell it.
You have LITERALLY no idea what you are talking about. utterly clueless about the consequences of such a US action.
Trader#4E19
Jan 16, 2026 1:19pm
Permalink
Quoting Riziq-Cap
{quote} bozo, whatever happens, if Venezuelan oil is stolen, Greenland is seized - none of that will affect your trailer life. murikans will see as much benefit as they saw during the invasion of Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan - body bags, international isolation, the weakening of the dollar, debt growth and murikans more hated world wide. natostan is actually done in all practical sense and EU benefited zero from natostan except wrecking havoc in regions and EU having to absorb the consequences. Your chatham house hasbara research might have worked...
Not a single one of your posts is coherent, properly formatted, proper English, intelligent, or relevant.

Every post you make shows how uneducated and uninformed you are. Of course people are allowed to post as they wish, but you are an unmitigated embarrassment.
Reply
Polimini
Jan 17, 2026 3:26am
Permalink
The US will enter a civil war soon, so we will be ridden of these idiotic morons soon. They are a worse menace to world peace than China at this point.
Reply
Riziq-Cap
Jan 16, 2026 11:30am
Permalink
Quoting LightchaserG
What is wrong with this guy!? mental job.
He thinks we are MAGGOT fools who would cheer on him after shooting us in Park Avenue...
Danger-Mouse
Jan 17, 2026 5:58am
Permalink
Quoting Ferna
{image}
Lookin mean but always chickens out huh? Looks like he's trying to force a difficult poo out? Mr 'I'll end all the wars' while starting or throwing fuel on half them.
Reply
noza
Jan 16, 2026 12:00pm
Permalink
Greenland is just a big divertion for something bigger Trump will do next, wait and see...
Reply
The Fool
Jan 16, 2026 1:41pm
Permalink
Inserted Video
Polimini
Jan 17, 2026 6:10am
Permalink
Waiting for... the "The Pedo King" gif.
Reply
Jr123
Jan 16, 2026 12:15pm
Permalink
The world needs to follow Canada's plan. Diversify trade and don't buy American if you can find products elsewhere. We don't even travel to the U.S. anymore.
Reply
Riziq-Cap
Jan 16, 2026 11:40am
Permalink
Quoting Jr123
The U.S. is about to lose trade with half the countries in the world. I hope Greenland is worth it because frozen minerals are very expensive to mine.
If Greenland was special, it would have been settled long time ago, the weather makes it impossible to live at, there is very little sun and very cold.

Russia struggles to settle its arctic front, even Kamchatka peninsula, much smaller than Greenland and surrounded by ocean(which makes the weather much better) are only settled by nomads and they are vanishing by the month.

If something is almost impossible to settle, it means it will be impossible to extract natural resources from.
Riziq-Cap
Jan 16, 2026 11:47am
Permalink
Quoting Trader#6FE9
They need to agree to sell it. The US could pay every human there a large amount of cash, and Denmark hundreds of billions. Or the US leaves NATO and the entire EU is in serious jeopardy. All you people from the EU trying to act tough is just nonsense, do your research on actual military fighting ability. Is one ice island with a small number of people worth risking all of Europe? Just get off your ego trip and sell it.
bozo, whatever happens, if Venezuelan oil is stolen, Greenland is seized - none of that will affect your trailer life.

murikans will see as much benefit as they saw during the invasion of Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan - body bags, international isolation, the weakening of the dollar, debt growth and murikans more hated world wide.

natostan is actually done in all practical sense and EU benefited zero from natostan except wrecking havoc in regions and EU having to absorb the consequences.

Your chatham house hasbara research might have worked in 2001.
Riziq-Cap
Jan 16, 2026 6:09pm
Permalink
Quoting Niru
{quote} No, perfectly coherent, perfectly relevant. Maybe for a dense little maga zombie like you, it is too difficult to understand, but there is nothing we can do about that now. An easy way to tell that you are an absolute twat is that you try so hard to make yourself sound intelligent by the language you use, however, you fail at that, too. What a clown haha
They fantasize away from their trailer park reality, thinking murikan military achievement is somehow relevant to their life, it somehow will benefit them, somehow make them look cool - while its the exact opposite.

Any adult and sane person knows its wrong to steal and its even more wrong to kill people through wars, putting aside international law, just purely moral.

Whatever happens in Greenland, i'm willing to bet it will have zero positive effect on average murikan life, your everyday trailer parker or metropolitan.
Darrendax
Jan 16, 2026 9:55pm
Permalink
Quoting Riziq-Cap
{quote} I appreciate you allowing me to post my opinion, in this "Brave New World" We need or the world need more engineered citizens like you. The Maggot crew have to be the most pathetic humans on earth - cant argue against your points, so they attack you. I will let your boss humiliate you: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTACH1eVIaA
Reply
Danger-Mouse
Jan 17, 2026 5:00am
Permalink
Quoting Trader#6FE9
They need to agree to sell it. The US could pay every human there a large amount of cash, and Denmark hundreds of billions. Or the US leaves NATO and the entire EU is in serious jeopardy. All you people from the EU trying to act tough is just nonsense, do your research on actual military fighting ability. Is one ice island with a small number of people worth risking all of Europe? Just get off your ego trip and sell it.
It's hardly Europe on the ego trip is it ? It's orange TACO. Why don't you just sell Alaska back to the Russians ? Now that you know it's turning BLUE?
Reply
Zeus20
Jan 16, 2026 12:17pm
Permalink
He probably is correct that the US needs Greenland, but don't be fooled, it's a subterfuge, there is no way this is about security or rare earths, there is something larger at play, very big, to risk its relationship with its long standing allies.
Reply
Trader#36AA
Jan 16, 2026 11:51am
Permalink
This is just another TACO moment. Chumpy can't do anything other than throw TACOs (or tariffs). Trump oozes weakness. Literally diarrhea's it out of his pie hole every waking moment - no supply issues here lol
Reply
Trader#F948
Jan 17, 2026 12:33am
Permalink
Quoting Trader#4E19
{quote} Not a single one of your posts is coherent, properly formatted, proper English, intelligent, or relevant. Every post you make shows how uneducated and uninformed you are. Of course people are allowed to post as they wish, but you are an unmitigated embarrassment.
Just don't engage with a word salad narcissist.
Reply
LightchaserG
Jan 16, 2026 11:35am
Permalink
Quoting Riziq-Cap
{quote} He thinks we are MAGGOT fools who would cheer on him after shooting us in Park Avenue...
That's just unbelievable, so sickening.
Reply
Trader#6FE9
Jan 16, 2026 11:33am
Permalink
They need to agree to sell it. The US could pay every human there a large amount of cash, and Denmark hundreds of billions. Or the US leaves NATO and the entire EU is in serious jeopardy. All you people from the EU trying to act tough is just nonsense, do your research on actual military fighting ability. Is one ice island with a small number of people worth risking all of Europe? Just get off your ego trip and sell it.
Reply
Riziq-Cap
Jan 16, 2026 4:42pm
Permalink
Quoting Trader#4E19
{quote} Not a single one of your posts is coherent, properly formatted, proper English, intelligent, or relevant. Every post you make shows how uneducated and uninformed you are. Of course people are allowed to post as they wish, but you are an unmitigated embarrassment.
I appreciate you allowing me to post my opinion, in this "Brave New World" We need or the world need more engineered citizens like you.

The Maggot crew have to be the most pathetic humans on earth - cant argue against your points, so they attack you.

I will let your boss humiliate you:
Inserted Video
Trader#DEF8
Jan 16, 2026 10:52pm
Permalink
Lets be straight, if you needed any futher evidence that Trump is an absolute c--t you now have it.
Reply
highdesertAZ
Jan 17, 2026 6:53am
Permalink
Trump's instinct on Greenalnd's importance for US security is correct. The Russians and Chinese are aggressilvely pursuing leverage on Greenland and in the Arctic. Obviously, Denmark can't defend Greenland and neither can the EU. Proof, the EU did next to nothing in stopping the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The EU knew (so did the USA) the Russians were going to invade years before they did, and did nothing to stop them. The US can not depend on the EU to defend the far northern part of the north Amercain continent. This is obvious to all with common sense and knowledge of history since the end of WWII.
Reply
Riziq-Cap
Jan 17, 2026 7:37am
Permalink
Quoting Polimini
The US will enter a civil war soon, so we will be ridden of these idiotic morons soon. They are a worse menace to world peace than China at this point.
How is China a threat to world peace? Never invaded a country, 1 foreign military base in Djibouti to protect its shipping lanes through the red sea/suez canal, builds infrastructure around the world, provide loans at better terms than IMF/WB, strengthen institutions of countries they trade with, never couped a country, their press is objective and dont ferment unrest , follows International law to the dot, weapons and tech they sell have no conditions or kill-switch, provides the world with cheap products.

Even historically, China have never been an empire were it conquered land. The ancient silkroad was based on trade, current silkroad is based on the same principles.

You can dislike China for being successful and threat to current satanic world order, but you cant claim they are a threat to world peace, that is objectively false.
Riziq-Cap
Jan 17, 2026 7:55am
Permalink
Quoting highdesertAZ
Trump's instinct on Greenalnd's importance for US security is correct. The Russians and Chinese are aggressilvely pursuing leverage on Greenland and in the Arctic. Obviously, Denmark can't defend Greenland and neither can the EU. Proof, the EU did next to nothing in stopping the Russian invasion of Ukraine. The EU knew (so did the USA) the Russians were going to invade years before they did, and did nothing to stop them. The US can not depend on the EU to defend the far northern part of the north Amercain continent. This is obvious to all with common...
Russia is part of the arctic, China is invited by Russia to exploit natural resources in the arctic, so is India.

Russia have exploited a fraction of its own natural resources within its legal boundaries in the arctic, arguing they are aiming to conquer Greenland is neither logical nor based on facts.

National security have become loose term, it can mean anything, US national security cant trump other nations sovereignty and security. US cant have national security all over the world - unless you want US to be world police?... They don't even follow international law.

You should open a lexicon for the definition of national security, initially it was meant to defend your border against external attacks, before US decided to include invading Afghanistan on the other side of the world, setting bar for national security to mean anything, including toppling governments, both close and afar.

orange man is a buffoon, he reads scripts and yells them loud, what worries me is the intellect rot among murikans... We have gone from occupy wall-street early 2000s to championing stealing land from allies....
Riziq-Cap
Jan 17, 2026 12:49pm
Permalink
Quoting Polimini
{quote} godamnit, why do you guys do this? What about Tibete? the shit with the Yugurs and the education camps, Hong Kong and how they just didn't respect the agreement they had with the British
The Uyghur debacle is a hyped up CIA psyop, you basically had extremist separatist who wanted to divide China, none of the Muslim countries recognize this as an issue, the only one who hype this up are the nations that are actually killing Muslims on a daily basis. It makes no sense for China to hate its own Muslims, but have strategic partnership with Muslim countries like Iran, Iraq etc. In fact, many of these Uyghur extremist joined ISIS in Syria and have their own brigade and are currently slaughtering Syrian Muslims and Christians after they toppled the secular Government of Syria... Who armed and arms these people? in their little landlocked enclave in Aleppo?(check video)

Hong Kong was British occupied territory, the agreement came out when East India Company(British company) were selling opium to Chinese citizens during the occupation of China - China managed to make an agreement with the Brits were they could lease Hong Kong for a century in exchange for stopping selling opium in mainland China - When the lease ended, China implemented sovereignty over Hong Kong, meaning national security laws in main land China would be applied to Hong Kong... Hong Kong, like Macau is part of the one state 2 system regime - it enjoys its own laws and system, which Chinese companies and government take advantage of btw. Main difference from the old system to the new is if you break Chinese laws in Hong Kong or Macau, you will be extradited to mainland China for trial.

You have clearly been mis-informed due to the immense propaganda regarding the hate for China, western rulers are very good at always pointing the finger far away to paint the enemy as foreign to distract from their own short-comings, crimes and mismanagement.

Portugal joined the invasion of my country, Iraq, now tell me where is your hate for Portugal? or the other 50 countries that ganged up on my country and literally destroyed everything, including 300 years old palm groves, canals, food production fabrics and electric system, additionally killed 1 million people.

China did not join the invasion, China actually are helping us build our country - When China invades its neighbors(excluding Taiwan) I will happily support your critique of China

I am not informed on Tibet, so I will refrain on commenting on that matter.

Inserted Video
Riziq-Cap
Jan 17, 2026 12:52pm
Permalink
Quoting Riziq-Cap
{quote} The Uyghur debacle is a hyped up CIA psyop, you basically had extremist separatist who wanted to divide China, none of the Muslim countries recognize this as an issue, the only one who hype this up are the nations that are actually killing Muslims on a daily basis. It makes no sense for China to hate its own Muslims, but have strategic partnership with Muslim countries like Iran, Iraq etc. In fact, many of these Uyghur extremist joined ISIS in Syria and have their own brigade and are currently slaughtering Syrian Muslims and Christians after...
Inserted Video
M-1equation
Jan 16, 2026 12:12pm
Permalink
another reason for buying commodities
Reply
Trader#E391
Jan 16, 2026 8:22pm
Permalink
Quoting Riziq-Cap
{quote} bozo, whatever happens, if Venezuelan oil is stolen, Greenland is seized - none of that will affect your trailer life. murikans will see as much benefit as they saw during the invasion of Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan - body bags, international isolation, the weakening of the dollar, debt growth and murikans more hated world wide. natostan is actually done in all practical sense and EU benefited zero from natostan except wrecking havoc in regions and EU having to absorb the consequences. Your chatham house hasbara research might have worked...
It’s acceptable if other countries dislike the United States. Power, not affection, determines outcomes in international politics. Nations comply with U.S. preferences because American economic and military strength outweighs that of any rival. Respect born of fear is sufficient; we do not need admiration. From this perspective, Greenland should fall under U.S. control. For national security, the President should act decisively and secure it.
Reply
Trader#1A55
Jan 17, 2026 2:30am
Permalink
Quoting Dutchy Daxy
{quote} Pay Denmark hundreds of billons $$ ? Let the money printer roll again. That Green(Ice)land has already US militairy basis and with normal diplomacy it could be doubled/trippled if the US is so affraid for the safety of the Greenlanders by a China/Russia invasion. After that said: Its not about "protection"...
greenland will serve an unsinkable carrier in the event of russian naval invasion. minerals are just bonus.

it was harry truman who tried to buy greenland. trump hasn't come up with something new as far as policies are concerned but he's quite persistent and he may get what he wants (or not)
Reply
Trader#E5E2
Jan 17, 2026 11:29am
Permalink
Half of Americans have voted for Trump for presidency. How they can complain now ? Other parts of the world just dislike more and more USA about their behavior. How he can impose any tariffs over the purchase of Greenland ? It is completely illegal to do so. SCOTUS really needs to interfere ASAP. He is just threatening the world with his tariffs. On IG Markets the US Indices are tanking now, which is completely logical. I hope the TACO move is on the way soon. Trump is by far the biggest manipulator of Wall Street in history. But I do not understand why this time on tariffs claims the EURUSD is down 60 pips on IG Markets weekend, while usually the EURUSD goes up because the US Dollar is sold on any new tariffs. Anyone can say or is IG Weekend just wrong here ?
Reply
Trader#5018
Jan 18, 2026 8:25am
Permalink
Dont let the guy so easy to get what he wanted ….. lolzzzz
Reply

  • Related Stories

Trump: I want to keep Hassett where he is
From investinglive.com | Jan 16, 2026 | 154 comments
Trump seems to rule out Hassett as Fed chair in comments. Trump said that Hassett was good on TV today and that he "may want to keep him where he is". He added that "we'll see how it works out". Some Republican Senators have expressed reservations about Hassett because he's so close to Trump, so he could be harder to confirm than the other three candidates. ...
U.S. threats of a Greenland takeover spark talk of trade wars
From cnbc.com | Jan 16, 2026 | 3 comments
A U.S. move to seize Greenland could damage trade ties with the European Union, France’s finance minister has warned, as one analyst told CNBC that tariffs or economic sanctions could lead to a “trade war.” U.S. President Donald Trump has ramped up talk of annexing Greenland this month — and has not ruled out taking it by force. Talks between the U.S., ...
Gold Falls as Trump Hesitates on Hassett as Fed Chair Pick
From finance.yahoo.com | Jan 16, 2026 | 3 comments
Gold slipped the most in more than two weeks after US President Donald Trump expressed reluctance about nominating Kevin Hassett as Federal Reserve chair, casting further doubt over his search for the next head of the central bank. Trump on Friday said if Hassett were to leave his post as director of the National Economic Council, it would deprive the ...
  • Story Stats