-
Fed's Goolsbee: indicators show a lot of labor market stability; I still think there is mild cooling in the labor market
Added at 7:40am
- FED'S GOOLSBEE:
MOST OF LABOR MARKET INDICATORS SHOW STABILITY IN MARKET -- CNBC INTERVIEW
SHOULD BE CAREFUL TAKING PAYROLL JOB NUMBER DROP AS AN INDICATOR OF JOB MARKET
MILD COOLING IN LABOR MARKET
UNEMPLOYMENT RATE BASICALLY UNCHANGED
A LITTLE DOWNSIDE RISK TO LABOR MARKET
THERE'S A LOT OF STABILITY
RECESSION STARTS ARE NOT USUALLY LOW HIRING, LOW FIRING
LOW HIRING, LOW FIRING IS CHARACTER OF AN UNCERTAIN ENVIRONMENT
MAYBE RELUCTANT TO CONTINUE RATE CUTTING CYCLE
Added at 7:41am
Added at 7:45am
Added at 7:46am
- Comments / Top
- Subscribe
Jade Gate
Nov 6, 2025 7:44am
Permalink
Trader#56FF
Nov 6, 2025 7:49am
Permalink
devonoved
Nov 6, 2025 10:29am
Permalink
Trader#DE63
Nov 6, 2025 7:46am
Permalink
Trader#B97C
Nov 6, 2025 7:57am
Permalink
Trader#6A12
Nov 6, 2025 9:03am
Permalink
mdbilalkhan9
Nov 7, 2025 12:52am
Permalink
Trader#590E
Nov 6, 2025 7:50am
Permalink
Trader#2B7F
Nov 6, 2025 8:07am
Permalink
Trader#5701
Nov 6, 2025 8:46am
Permalink
Trader#A306
Nov 6, 2025 9:04am
Permalink
Trader#CDDA
Nov 6, 2025 5:32pm
Permalink
-
Related Stories
Fed's Miran: I Expect We Will Cut In December - I Want To Get To Neutral In 50 BPS Increments; A Lot Of My Colleagues Want 25 Bps Increments MIRAN: DON'T NEED 75 BASIS POINT CUT, DON'T NEED TO MAKE UP FOR LOST GROUND ON CUTS
*FED'S WILLIAMS: NATURAL RATE OF INTEREST IS HARD TO PIN DOWN *NEW YORK FED'S JOHN WILLIAMS SPEAKS AT EVENT IN FRANKFURT Fed's Williams: Model-based US neutral rate estimates are around 1%, the bond market suggests higher neutral rate, but I would discount that.
FEDS HAMMACK: 'NOT OBVIOUS' U.S. CENTRAL BANK SHOULD CUT INTEREST RATES AGAIN GIVEN INFLATION Fed's Hammack: It will take two to three years to get inflation back to 2%. FED'S HAMMACK: MONETARY POLICY IS 'ONLY BARELY RESTRICTIVE, IF AT ALL'
Balancing Act: The Dual Mandate on an Economic Tightrope My thanks to the Economic Club of New York for inviting me to speak today and to Bill Dudley for moderating what Im sure will be an engaging discussion. As many of you know, I lived and worked in New York for 30 years before moving to Cleveland to begin my new role at the Federal Reserve. I love Cleveland, and I love talking with friends and neighbors about all the great things to see and do in Northeast Ohio. But I have to chuckle when the topic turns to Cleveland traffic, which is nothing compared to the endless gridlock that I experienced in Manhattanbefore congestion pricing kicked in, of course. Some of you might be thinking, just take the subway! If only the decision were that simple. When I lived in New York, I faced the daily debate about the comfort of a cab or the certainty of subway timing. But even once in the subway, I faced the maddening choice: do I jump on the local 1 train pulling into the station or wait for the express 3 train that says its four minutes away? Getting around New York is a balancing act to optimize every second of every day, and right now a balancing act feels like the perfect metaphor for monetary policy: If the economy is a tightrope, policymakers are tasked with walking a fine line to keep our dual mandate goals of maximum employment and price stability in balance. Today Im going to talk about why I believe policy should be at a mildly restrictive setting to strike the right balance between our goals. But let me stress the I part of that sentence and indicate, as always, that these are only my views and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve System or of my colleagues on the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC).