Trump: Russian economy is going to collapse | Metals Mine
Added at 1:45pm
Comment Options
NotAtrader
Oct 14, 2025 2:07pm
Permalink
Oh poor putinoso. He is going to be sad. Donaldo must do something to prevent that from happening.
Anyways, how did Trump figure that out. He must be master of economic science
Reply
chemosi
Oct 15, 2025 7:54am
Permalink

To those singing about the demise of USA while still expecting NATO to win against Russia

"Military Analyst Warns US Doesn't Have Enough Tomahawks To Send To Ukraine"
https://www.zerohedge.com/military/m...s-send-ukraine
" Stacie Pettyjohn, director of the defense program at the Center for a New American Security think-tank, said Washington could spare some 20 to 50 Tomahawks for Ukraine, “which will not decisively shift the dynamics of the war”.

While the long-range missiles could complement Ukraine’s own long-range attack drones and cruise missiles “in large complex salvos to greater effect”, they would “still will be a very limited capability . . . certainly not enough to enable sustained, deep attacks against Russia”, they added."
Reply
chemosi
Oct 15, 2025 8:21am
Permalink
Quoting TraderTero
{quote} Russia can't even beat Ukraine, so how do you expect them to beat about 1 billion people living in NATO countries. Russia is much weaker than you think.
....
I will give you some time to get some rational logical thinking to your head...
Reply
chemosi
Oct 15, 2025 8:49am
Permalink
Quoting TraderTero
{quote} I happen to live in country with some 1300 km common border with Russia so I believe I have enough rational logical thinking and knowledge about Russian capabilities as well as about our own military capabilities as a NATO member.
What are Russia full military capabilities???
Western military industrial complex, are they geared towards winning wars or more towards profit??
What part does China play?
Reply
chemosi
Oct 15, 2025 9:13am
Permalink
Quoting TraderTero
{quote} I think you are confused and poisoned by Putin's propaganda.
as expected...i was more waiting for a russian bot or something...
Logical reasoning failure from you as expected...
Reply
chemosi
Oct 15, 2025 9:16am
Permalink
Quoting TraderTero
{quote} "The US currently maintains an estimated 4,150 Tomahawk missiles. Since 2022, over 120 of the 200 newly procured missiles have already been fired, according to defense analysts. The Pentagon's 2026 budget requests funding for only 57 additional missiles."
" Mark Cancian, a former Pentagon official now at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think-tank, estimated in a recent war game that the US had 4,150 Tomahawks in total. However, the US would probably be able to supply only a few to Ukraine.

This is in light of the fact that, out of the 200 the Pentagon has procured since 2022, it has already fired more than 120, according to defense experts. The defense department has requested funding for only 57 more Tomahawks in its 2026 budget. Washington would probably also need Tomahawks for any strike on Venezuelan soil."
Reply
Schultz
Oct 15, 2025 11:03am
Permalink
Quoting TraderTero
{quote} Of course they can provide more than 25 if they want. In any case I was not referring only to Tomahawks. I'm talking about all kinds of missiles including Taurus and ballistic missiles. A former Pentagon official is not making those decisions. In any case it's a waste time to continue this discussion with you.
And honestly, I think that one must take all this information provided so far here in comments very cautiously.

I can think of a few reasons to be sceptical, but that's just me.
Reply
TraderTero
Oct 15, 2025 7:05am
Permalink
Just give Ukraine proper weapons to destroy Russian oil terminals and oil producing facilities and the war will end. They are already having fuel shortages.
Price
Oct 14, 2025 3:55pm
Permalink
Oil is trading at Daily lows and the weekly chart is down.
Those prices are not good for cash flow over there.
Reply
Subdude
Oct 14, 2025 3:13pm
Permalink
I've got the perfectly ironic metaphor for this occasion:
Inserted Video
Reply
chemosi
Oct 15, 2025 10:50am
Permalink
Quoting TraderTero
{quote} A former Pentagon official is not making those decisions.

TACO Trump is making those decisions....all the best of luck
Reply
Trader#4073
Oct 14, 2025 1:55pm
Permalink
With 17% inflation, down from over 20%. Who would've thought?? Even this guy plucked it from the depths of an abyss.

https://tenor.com/view/crazy-eyes-st...16276663604660
Reply
ngovsunhout
Oct 14, 2025 2:03pm
Permalink
I dont think so
Reply
TraderTero
Oct 15, 2025 8:17am
Permalink
Quoting chemosi
To those singing about the demise of USA while still expecting NATO to win against Russia "Military Analyst Warns US Doesn't Have Enough Tomahawks To Send To Ukraine" https://www.zerohedge.com/military/m...s-send-ukraine " Stacie Pettyjohn, director of the defense program at the Center for a New American Security think-tank, said Washington could spare some 20 to 50 Tomahawks for Ukraine, “which will not decisively shift the dynamics of the war”. While...
Russia can't even beat Ukraine, so how do you expect them to beat about 1 billion people living in NATO countries. Russia is much weaker than you think.
TraderTero
Oct 15, 2025 8:36am
Permalink
Quoting chemosi
{quote} .... I will give you some time to get some rational logical thinking to your head...
I happen to live in country with some 1300 km common border with Russia so I believe I have enough rational logical thinking and knowledge about Russian capabilities as well as about our own military capabilities as a NATO member.
TraderTero
Oct 15, 2025 9:06am
Permalink
Quoting chemosi
To those singing about the demise of USA while still expecting NATO to win against Russia "Military Analyst Warns US Doesn't Have Enough Tomahawks To Send To Ukraine" https://www.zerohedge.com/military/m...s-send-ukraine " Stacie Pettyjohn, director of the defense program at the Center for a New American Security think-tank, said Washington could spare some 20 to 50 Tomahawks for Ukraine, “which will not decisively shift the dynamics of the war”. While...
"The US currently maintains an estimated 4,150 Tomahawk missiles. Since 2022, over 120 of the 200 newly procured missiles have already been fired, according to defense analysts. The Pentagon's 2026 budget requests funding for only 57 additional missiles."
TraderTero
Oct 15, 2025 9:09am
Permalink
Quoting chemosi
{quote} What are Russia full military capabilities??? Western military industrial complex, are they geared towards winning wars or more towards profit?? What part does China play?
I think you are confused and poisoned by Putin's propaganda.
TraderTero
Oct 15, 2025 10:15am
Permalink
Quoting chemosi
{quote} " Mark Cancian, a former Pentagon official now at the Center for Strategic and International Studies think-tank, estimated in a recent war game that the US had 4,150 Tomahawks in total. However, the US would probably be able to supply only a few to Ukraine. This is in light of the fact that, out of the 200 the Pentagon has procured since 2022, it has already fired more than 120, according to defense experts. The defense department has requested funding for only 57 more Tomahawks in its 2026 budget. Washington would probably also need...
Of course they can provide more than 25 if they want. In any case I was not referring only to Tomahawks. I'm talking about all kinds of missiles including Taurus and ballistic missiles.

A former Pentagon official is not making those decisions. In any case it's a waste time to continue this discussion with you.
Trader#2F9D
Oct 14, 2025 2:02pm
Permalink
that picture of trump is legendary lol
Reply
Trader#4DFB
Oct 14, 2025 4:59pm
Permalink
Quoting Trader#3834
jesus will he ever shut his big mouth. what did russia ever do to him or america for that matter f67k ukraine just get the hell out and mind your own business
17% inflation must be like a BPC stuck, permanently, up yer pooper hole, hey?

P.s. BPC - Big Putin Cock. And get out of Ukraine. The EU is coming:

https://www.defensenews.com/global/e...rowth-in-2025/

This is why Pootin and his army of (shitty) internet bots are scrambling, like rats:

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/putin...130000073.html
https://www.google.com/search?q=russia+drones&tbm=nws

Ouch, didn't I just insert my BC... into your already busy pooper hole.
Reply
Trader#D428
Oct 14, 2025 1:56pm
Permalink
The nobel prize for economics should be awarded to this shitty head.
Reply
Trader#3834
Oct 14, 2025 4:28pm
Permalink
jesus will he ever shut his big mouth. what did russia ever do to him or america for that matter
f67k ukraine just get the hell out and mind your own business
Reply
Trader#1F1C
Oct 14, 2025 7:08pm
Permalink
TACO has been writing this for 4 years!!! Only fools believe it
Reply

  • Related Stories

Trump: China not buying soybeans is an economically hostile act, considering terminating elements of trade
From @realDonaldTrump | Oct 14, 2025 | 102 comments
I believe that China purposefully not buying our Soybeans, and causing difficulty for our Soybean Farmers, is an Economically Hostile Act. We are considering terminating business with China having to do with Cooking Oil, and other elements of Trade, as retribution. As an example, we can easily produce Cooking Oil ourselves, we don’t need to purchase it from China.
ECB's Lagarde: Economy has been relatively resilient to tariffs
From @financialjuice | Oct 14, 2025
ECB's Lagarde: Economy has been relatively resilient to tariffs. ECB LAGARDE SAYS ECB GENERALLY IN A GOOD PLACE LAGARDE SAYS MONETARY POLICY IN EUROPE HAS DONE ITS JOB ECB's President Lagarde: I would never say ECB is done cutting rates. LAGARDE SAYS RISKS TO INFLATION OUTLOOK `FAIRLY BALANCED'
Fed’s Powell: Data before U.S. Government shutdown suggested growth may be better than expected
From @DeItaone | Oct 14, 2025 | 23 comments
FED’S POWELL: DATA BEFORE U.S. GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN SUGGESTED GROWTH MAY BE BETTER THAN EXPECTED Understanding the Fed’s Balance Sheet Thank you, Emily. And thank you to the National Association for Business Economics for the Adam Smith Award. It is an honor just to be mentioned alongside past recipients, including my predecessors Janet Yellen and Ben Bernanke. Thank you for this recognition and for the opportunity to speak with you today. Monetary policy is more effective when the public understands what the Federal Reserve does and why. With that in mind, I hope to enhance understanding of one of the more arcane and technical aspects of monetary policy: the Federal Reserve's balance sheet. A colleague recently compared this topic to a trip to the dentist, but that comparison may be unfair—to dentists.1 Today, I will discuss the essential role our balance sheet played during the pandemic, along with some lessons learned. I will then review our ample reserves implementation framework and the progress we have made toward normalizing the size of our balance sheet. I will conclude with some brief remarks on the economic outlook. One of the primary purposes of a central bank is to provide the monetary foundation for the financial system and the broader economy. This foundation is made of central bank liabilities. On the Fed's balance sheet, the liability side of the ledger totaled $6.5 trillion as of October 8, and three categories account for roughly 95 percent of that total.2 First, Federal Reserve notes—that is, physical currency—totaled $2.4 trillion. Second, reserves—funds held by depository institutions at the Federal Reserve Banks—totaled $3.0 trillion. These deposits allow commercial banks to make and receive payments and meet regulatory requirements. Reserves are the safest and most liquid asset in the financial system, and only the Fed can create them. The adequate provision of reserves is essential to the safety and soundness of our banking system, the resilience and efficiency of our payments system, and ultimately the stability of our economy. FED’S POWELL: AVAILABLE DATA SHOW TARIFFS PUSHING UP PRICE PRESSURES FED’S POWELL: U.S. CENTRAL BANK HAS OTHER DATA BEYOND GOVERNMENT SOURCES TO USE FED’S POWELL: CURRENT FED POLICY TOOLKIT WORKING VERY WELL POWELL: OUTLOOK HASN’T CHANGED MUCH SINCE SEPTEMBER FED MEETING FED’S POWELL: MAY BE APPROACHING END OF BALANCE SHEET CONTRACTION ‘IN COMING MONTHS’
  • Story Stats