Flying Dutchman

Hi deany

From what I can glean, your formula seems wanting to likely integrate some harmonic oscillator with a deviation or volatility component, within a time scale, and then some other extra multiple amplitude oscillators.

So my simple answer to your complex formula (question) might be

Why not !

Especially if it lands you in or around some of george’s TARGETS, TARGETS, TARGETS areas
You could then for sure take notice, I guess.

(I might be just as happy though using a short, medium & long combined set of ema’s in the meantime I reckon)

trade safe folks & trade well
(and NO charts from me today - they would all look the same anyway imo, after the market does its own particular mechanics)

All the best deany

1. Price at time t(P(t)) is a result of:
   1. Initial price (P0).
   2. Zig-zag behavior represented by the sinusoidal function, simulating the oscillatory nature of price movements.
   3. Volatility impact captured through the volatility model, adjusting price changes based on current market conditions.
   4. Liquidity targeting, where the algorithm focuses on specific price levels where liquidity exists, influencing the overall price action.

Conclusion
This mathematical framework provides a basic representation of how algorithms manipulate price movements through zig-zag dynamics, targeting liquidity clusters, and responding to volatility.

It offers insights into the core components that could be involved in algorithmic trading strategies.

Hi Time tell, i don't know if you can improve that for US. May be you can give refinement and happy ending. May be

Kind Regard

Still missing George equation component regarding multi time frame fractal price structure.
While enjiying my country music

Hi deany,
No I cannot help internally with your formula, sorry, not my skillset.
There will be other algorithmic traders that may take you further with this.

Explain to them what you require as an output.
ie failed expansion, trade entry area, trade exit point etc etc

I just use basic targets that I call trader attractors, and then discretionary entries from there.


Here's george's 15m charts below with his 3 x ma's (short, medium, long) if that might help in the interim.
https://www.forexfactory.com/thread/...8#post11929838

all the best, sir

Deany !!! You posted the Holy Grail..on a public forum !
Oh boy....now u gonna have Illuminati and Rothschild offspring after you
You better let dog pre-taste all your restaurant meals from now on.

Sorry, i even don't know the formula actually.
Thats like allien mathematical equation
I just pretend smart and just learn to be like master
Like BWilliam and darkstar
To give you impression i'm mathematical nerd

I'm just simple farmer
With my cat and cofee
I must shoot off my mouth
Helicopter Ben Bernanke is getting around
It is forbidden to be rich and free at the same time here

Trust me, you don't need all that mathematical stuff.

You just need a nice clean chart, a simple repeatable strategy, good observation skills, a good grasp of Market Structure and Human Psychiology.

You can't code the last three.

As soon as you posted the equation, I looked it up. It's just an equation so yes it can be applied directly, but we still need some components (as suggested by TimeTells and ChatGPT):


"In the context of Forex trading, the given equation could be adapted to model the price movement P(t)P(t) of a currency pair over time, incorporating various factors that influence exchange rates. Let's break down how each component might relate to the Forex market:

P(t)=P0+A⋅sin⁡(ωt+ϕ)+k⋅σ(t)⋅f(T)+∑i=1n(Θ(Pi)⋅Oi(t))P(t)=P0+A⋅sin(ωt+ϕ)+k⋅σ(t)⋅f(T)+i=1∑n(Θ(Pi)⋅Oi(t))

Applying Each Term to Forex:

1. P0P0: Represents the initial exchange rate of the currency pair, acting as a reference or starting point for analysis.
2. A⋅sin⁡(ωt+ϕ)A⋅sin(ωt+ϕ):
   1. This term captures the cyclical or seasonal behavior of the currency pair, representing predictable fluctuations influenced by:
      1. Economic cycles (e.g., quarterly GDP releases, interest rate changes).
      2. Daily or weekly trading patterns (e.g., session opens/closes, holidays).

   2. The amplitude AA, frequency ωω, and phase ϕϕ could be adjusted based on known cycles (e.g., non-farm payrolls, central bank meetings).

3. k⋅σ(t)⋅f(T)k⋅σ(t)⋅f(T):
   1. kk: A scaling factor representing the intensity or impact of volatility on the price.
   2. σ(t)σ(t): Could be the volatility index or a measure of market sentiment at time tt. In Forex, volatility often increases around major news events or geopolitical events.
   3. f(T)f(T): Might be a function representing the trend or macroeconomic factors like interest rate differentials, inflation, or monetary policy shifts.

   Together, this term models how volatility and macroeconomic factors affect the exchange rate over time.
   
   

4. ∑i=1n(Θ(Pi)⋅Oi(t))∑i=1n(Θ(Pi)⋅Oi(t)):
   1. Represents a summation of influences from various factors:
      1. Θ(Pi)Θ(Pi): Could be a function modeling the weight or influence of different technical indicators (e.g., moving averages, RSI, MACD) on the price movement.
      2. Oi(t)Oi(t): Represents the actual values or signals of these indicators over time.

   This part captures how technical analysis tools combine to impact the currency pair's price.
   
   

Example Application in Forex:

Imagine you are a Forex trader analyzing the EUR/USD pair. The equation could help model the price as follows:

1. Baseline: P0P0 is set to the exchange rate when your analysis begins.
2. Cyclical Influences: The term A⋅sin⁡(ωt+ϕ)A⋅sin(ωt+ϕ) captures the known cyclicality, such as the EUR/USD's tendency to move around the European and U.S. trading sessions.
3. Volatility Impact: k⋅σ(t)⋅f(T)k⋅σ(t)⋅f(T) accounts for spikes in volatility during high-impact news events like ECB interest rate decisions or U.S. job reports, with f(T)f(T) reflecting underlying economic trends.
4. Technical Indicators: The summation term ∑i=1n(Θ(Pi)⋅Oi(t))∑i=1n(Θ(Pi)⋅Oi(t)) combines signals from multiple indicators to refine the model’s predictions on how price might change.

Practical Usage:

1. Forecasting: Traders could use this equation to forecast potential price movements by inputting expected values of volatility, macroeconomic trends, and technical indicator signals.
2. Algorithmic Trading: In algorithmic strategies, the model can help decide entry and exit points by understanding the interplay between cyclical patterns, volatility, and technical indicators.

This model offers a comprehensive way to capture the multifaceted nature of Forex price movements by integrating both cyclical patterns and dynamic factors like volatility and technical analysis."

Hells Bells
Now I know what I have been doing wrong

Every trader has their own view, their own methodology, their own paradigm of what’s going on
Yet we all trade in the same market

Folks know, I imagine, that I like (prefer) to use Station to station & george (target, target, target) concepts in my trading

Is this the ONLY or the BEST way to trade
No
This trading stuff is a personal trading game going on within a collective trading arena imo


So, I will basically see the (for myself that is)
Trader attractors, Confluence zones, stations stepping up & down
Inflection points & any compression (inflection point) build up prior to a breakout
With some Fake’n’Flips thrown in to shake out weak hands (often at intraday opens Franky/London/NY)
And any Bermuda Triangles to ccmplete their round trip market cycles

Each day, it's the same old story (imho)
So how will my day review charts vary then, post after post (after post, sorry lol )
Well
ONLY by price & time

And all available via standard indicators


We can still use all the maths we wish (simple or complex),
and we could also employ our eyes
OR
We could even use BOTH

Each trader I guess will use what suits their own personal style (their own personal life psychology) best


In the end though it’s all Wyckoff behaviour to me, as my easiest understanding
(though obviously W’s graphics do not show any price, time, or any levels - that’s up to US to include later)

If the market is a repetitive cycle, then the only variable in a trade choice it seems is ultimately, ourselves
Trade safe, trade well all

Why not
some graphics and
yesterday’s GJ review chart (with ALL the confluence areas & stations known in advance)

.

Just a quick update from the chart posted 5 hours ago.
My morning in Asia is over.
Back for the Franky/London fun & games later

Trade safe, trade well all


.

Thank you BROTHER
Ultimate Objective:
Strategymax[t=0∑TE(Liquidity Capture−Risk−Detection)dt]

Something missing i think. But just remembering his main objective as mathematical expression

Thank you Shab for encouragement in simple is the best. Thank you FLYING DUTCHMAN

Please ignore my post. I'm just keyboard warrior.
Pretend to be smart but always look funny at the end of vespa and music country.

Stackelberg Game Model is really Nakamoto expertise in contrarian vespa. With vintage style while enjoy the uncertainty.

EYES is the most elegant paint, MR. TT

Hi deany,

I can always enjoy your sense of humour

(and with """eyes"""" I will say, don't let them be driven by our 'imaginations', our eyes must find solid logical references else they are but 'dreamings')

all the best sir

Have a word with
This GUY
for the Station to Station Time Table ?

GJ is a different Beast.

This would be my effort