Another motivation guys this guy made it. 200k with apex. I've been following him for a while. Follows his rules strictly not gonna comment on his trading style.
Extreme gut feeling trader
2
Anyone trading with a Prop firm 31 replies
So I accepted a Prop Trading job in South Beach Miami 44 replies
prop firm new model - my trading journey 871 replies
DislikedAnother motivation guys this guy made it. 200k with apex. I've been following him for a while. Follows his rules strictly not gonna comment on his trading style. {image}Ignored
DislikedJust a random post one of the streamers lost alot of apex funded accounts in 2min. I dont like to see others losing but its good for me to show to my brain NEVER DO THIS on my accounts. Apex not cheap 4k in total evals + activation fee. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Expo, reading your detailed posts, which have been excellent for whoever wants to dive into Darwin, I have a main doubt, even before wasting time in the technicalities of the program. Do you think Darwin is worthwhile for whoever doesn't want to create an auditable record, which is my case ? I mean, Darwin seems to take a bit of time and, in my case, I usually only make 1 or 2 trades a day. It seems I would take a long time until being trading a reasonable capital. All my other alternatives, either forex or futures, with easier/faster money...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I got the answers to my two questions.{image} At this point for me it's best to just trade tiny until the end of the month to get that 30K just to make sure we get the ball rolling. Afterall, it's all about track record. If I was still below the 75 rating I'd continue overleveraging as there seems to be no personal penalty for doing that.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I think you will find if you had the data posted January 2023 their a-book was significantly more and their VIP accounts were mostly A-booked. They were fine via risk mitigation and some fairly good know how. They were also at 35m/month when they were shut down. From the public record there are some spreadsheets and conversations they were part taking in to monetize as well. So in terms of them vs others - built different. But hey, an out of context catch phrase and the fact murtuza had a bugatti is all that matters.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Just to follow up on what I said. I get my beloved Meta4(for now anyways). I can trade any way I like. No SL rules, news rules, weird consistency rules, IP address issues, and on and on. I don't have to rush for fear that the rug pull may be just around the corner. No ridiculous profit caps. All I need to do is earn 3-5% per month and I'll have a nice gig for my retirement years And I just like the idea of attracting real capital from real investors. Nobody named Matt, Blake, or Scamgelo. Plus in the first year the total cost to me is 106...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Days before shutdown Josh was hinting that they figured something out with the data and they were about to start paying traders even if they blew accounts... do you have any idea what that may have been?Ignored
DislikedAnother motivation guys this guy made it. 200k with apex. I've been following him for a while. Follows his rules strictly not gonna comment on his trading style. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} You're doing forex, correct? Futures is also an option. I'm sure the indices are available as cash instruments on the forex side?Ignored
Disliked{quote} How do they define Value at Risk? I can use 20 lots on 100K account an put 5 pip stop. So technically my Value at risk is 1% (1K) In their example it says High water mark to low water mark which makes sense. But that happens only when overleveraged position reaches to some level of unrealized losses. Alternatively I can divide same position into 100 parts but risk still remains same. I am trying to understand overleverage on darwin context.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Days before shutdown Josh was hinting that they figured something out with the data and they were about to start paying traders even if they blew accounts... do you have any idea what that may have been?Ignored
Disliked{quote} Expo, reading your detailed posts, which have been excellent for whoever wants to dive into Darwin, I have a main doubt, even before wasting time in the technicalities of the program. Do you think Darwin is worthwhile for whoever doesn't want to create an auditable record, which is my case ? I mean, Darwin seems to take a bit of time and, in my case, I usually only make 1 or 2 trades a day. It seems I would take a long time until being trading a reasonable capital. All my other alternatives, either forex or futures, with easier/faster money...Ignored
Disliked{quote} You might go with Darwinex classic live with account as low as 1 or 2K deposit (depending on your resident country). Both Darwinex classic and zero are same except on one signal account is your real account and on another it is demo account. I think small live account will get more skin in the game plus no fees and no pressure of wasting and recovering money on fees.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Im in the US that's why I had to use DZero. Looked into Darwinex live 7 years ago when they were trying to break into the US market. I was drooling over their model. Ultimately they abandoned that plan due to the nightmare and cost. Thank you US regulations for protecting me from a great opportunity. Imagine having a 7 year track record already.Ignored
Disliked{quote} You make some great points....for about the cost of a "traditional" 100K challenge (spread over a year), you get MT4, all of the instruments, build a track record, trade real funds and no need to worry about not being paid.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Yup, like I said in the post above I could have had a 7 year track record and been managing millions already. (assuming I could make a few percent a month) Thank you to the US regulators for protecting me from myself. Phew, that was close. I almost got sucked into a great opportunity.Ignored