Prop Firm Hub | Page 1558 | Metals Mine

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Anyone trading with a Prop firm 31 replies

So I accepted a Prop Trading job in South Beach Miami 44 replies

prop firm new model - my trading journey 871 replies

Attachments: Prop Firm Hub
Exit Attachments

Prop Firm Hub

  • #31,141
  • Feb 19, 2024 11:40am Feb 19, 2024 11:40am
Guys do yourself a favor, Start learning how to trade Futures ! There is not much online but buy some books, do whatever you can but get in Futures. There will be more and more prop firms offering Futures funding. Learn how to use Tradovate platform, signup with the smallest account at apex for like $48 / month (after discount) and get in to it. Think of this as paying to learn.
Drawdown is more important than Account Size !
  • #31,142
  • Feb 19, 2024 11:40am Feb 19, 2024 11:40am
Quoting procrude
{quote} {image}
so 5.6....yeah, no Thanks. Can everyone see why the US offerings are pure garbage. Complete market making, spread markup, freezing patform, price spiking bullshit....but hey, they're "regulated"
  • #31,143
  • Feb 19, 2024 11:40am Feb 19, 2024 11:40am
Quoting TrAndy1
Have you ever wondered which country has the best traders? Using 24 months of data, we ranked the traders of the top 20 countries by registration on 5 categories: total payouts, unique payouts, breach rate, account duration and scaling rate. Each country was scored a max of 20 points per category, from the highest ranked to lowest. All of the points were then combined to assign an overall power ranking out of 100. {image} {image}
which website is that??
  • #31,144
  • Feb 19, 2024 11:42am Feb 19, 2024 11:42am
Quoting genuine007
{quote} which website is that??
From Twitter
  • #31,145
  • Feb 19, 2024 11:46am Feb 19, 2024 11:46am
Quoting TrAndy1
{quote} yes Funding Pips = FP. Should be back in a few days or weeks. They recently announced many new platforms. And I do not trust them really.
Why do you not trust them, if I may ask? I think I agree with your opinion that firms that don't leave the US are suspicious.
  • #31,146
  • Feb 19, 2024 11:47am Feb 19, 2024 11:47am
Quoting pipmaster77
{quote} so 5.6....yeah, no Thanks. Can everyone see why the US offerings are pure garbage. Complete market making, spread markup, freezing patform, price spiking bullshit....but hey, they're "regulated"
Yeah, I checked my offshore broker and it was not even 1 pip, which is good for it being a U.S. holiday and all.
  • #31,147
  • Feb 19, 2024 11:50am Feb 19, 2024 11:50am
Quoting Mitiblotch
{quote} Why do you not trust them, if I may ask? I think I agree with your opinion that firms that don't leave the US are suspicious.
Because they are new and have not much payout history. I would put them on my backup list after FTMO.
  • #31,148
  • Feb 19, 2024 12:04pm Feb 19, 2024 12:04pm
Quoting TrAndy1
{quote} Because they are new and have not much payout history. I would put them on my backup list after FTMO.
Thanks for your input. Do you have an idea about FXIFY? I checked online and reviews about them are excellent. How about Oanda' Labtrader? Any idea about them apart from their exorbitant fees? I live in the UK.
  • #31,149
  • Feb 19, 2024 12:09pm Feb 19, 2024 12:09pm
Quoting CableJ
I actually welcome this if they just bring daily limit + static DD over to futures and force the existing players to respond.... a TFT in futures with no control of platform, spread or slippage would be interesting.
-I imagined that TFT would find a way to make it simulated, and thus 'malleable'. And if not, then the minimum SL distance would be imposed. I suppose that my views regarding this firm are biased.
  • #31,150
  • Feb 19, 2024 12:09pm Feb 19, 2024 12:09pm
Quoting pipmaster77
however, being in the US, looks like back to trading our own money.
-And taking on more risk. Interesting how that works out.
  • #31,151
  • Feb 19, 2024 12:10pm Feb 19, 2024 12:10pm
Quoting Takisd
They will, fairly quickly.
-The only way that this can happen is if it can be proven that said software providers knowingly aid and abet violations of regulations. Knowingly providing servers to brokers that offer services to US residents illegally, would constitute CFTC involvement. Since the remote prop space is a legal gray area, as of this writing, it does not seem unreasonable that Meta would force brokers to drop them, especially if they are concerned about remaining on the App Store, ensuring a good IPO launch or a myriad of other reasons etc..

The CFTC does not force or require trading software businesses to allocate resources to police broker behavior on their behalf, but software providers are expected to exercise due diligence and implement appropriate measures to prevent their software from being used for illegal purposes. But what is expected and what is required are two, different things.

It can be very difficult to prove that a software provider is aware of illegal broker activity, especially if the software provider can position themselves so that they have no access or involvement with the demo accounts, unlike Meta.
  • #31,152
  • Feb 19, 2024 12:12pm Feb 19, 2024 12:12pm
Quoting woody70
{quote} Yeah, I checked my offshore broker and it was not even 1 pip, which is good for it being a U.S. holiday and all.
and people wonder why US traders use offshore brokers as opposed to the absolute trash in the US.
  • #31,153
  • Feb 19, 2024 12:13pm Feb 19, 2024 12:13pm
Quoting Nsak3y
{quote}-And taking on more risk. Interesting how that works out.
and paying 5.6 on GBPAUD when I'm paying 0.5 now.
  • #31,154
  • Feb 19, 2024 12:15pm Feb 19, 2024 12:15pm
Bespokefunding seem to be closing some tickets about live accounts
Is bespoke broke now ?
Not a single payout has been processed in almost a month
Just check the payout proof section
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: IMG_2106.jpg Size: 26 KB
  • #31,155
  • Feb 19, 2024 12:17pm Feb 19, 2024 12:17pm
Quoting Mitiblotch
{quote} Thanks for your input. Do you have an idea about FXIFY? I checked online and reviews about them are excellent. How about Oanda' Labtrader? Any idea about them apart from their exorbitant fees? I live in the UK.
I would wait on FXIFY until they have solved the US traders issue. Oanda is not available for USA and most EU countries too. Also htrader not from Hantec broker.
  • #31,156
  • Feb 19, 2024 12:22pm Feb 19, 2024 12:22pm
1] TFT 2] SFT 3] Rocket 21 4] Secure The Bag 5]Fortunes Funding 6] Prop Firm Journal [it is a review site. Has evaluation accounts of its own. But not seen any customers] [Leveledup Society used to be his firm. Parted ways at the end of September].

Who else is under Angelo apart from SFT?
  • #31,157
  • Feb 19, 2024 12:25pm Feb 19, 2024 12:25pm
Quoting TrAndy1
1] TFT 2] SFT 3] Rocket 21 4] Secure The Bag 5]Fortunes Funding 6] Prop Firm Journal [it is a review site. Has evaluation accounts of its own. But not seen any customers] [Leveledup Society used to be his firm. Parted ways at the end of September]. Who else is under Angelo apart from SFT?
Maybe UWM but needs confirmation.
  • #31,158
  • Feb 19, 2024 12:32pm Feb 19, 2024 12:32pm
Quoting TrAndy1
{quote} I would wait on FXIFY until they have solved the US traders issue. Oanda is not available for USA and most EU countries too. Also htrader not from Hantec broker.
Yes it is just ask in hantec support
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: htrader.png Size: 6 KB
  • #31,159
  • Feb 19, 2024 12:35pm Feb 19, 2024 12:35pm
Quoting DeltaCapital
{quote} Yes it is just ask in hantec support {image}
I meant by not with htrader you cannot participate as US or UK or German too.
  • #31,160
  • Feb 19, 2024 12:36pm Feb 19, 2024 12:36pm
MQ losses from these things - Very low at this moment. Not significant in any manner. They may benefit in future
49 traders viewing now