Disliked{quote} Well as long as they are accepting any North american clients (directly or indirectly) they can sue them. Why do you think any good forex brokers (offshore) is not accepting forex clients from US or Canada?Ignored
1
3
Anyone trading with a Prop firm 31 replies
So I accepted a Prop Trading job in South Beach Miami 44 replies
prop firm new model - my trading journey 871 replies
Disliked{quote} Well as long as they are accepting any North american clients (directly or indirectly) they can sue them. Why do you think any good forex brokers (offshore) is not accepting forex clients from US or Canada?Ignored
Disliked{quote} They could if they were taking US clients but they have not been in this case. Btw, they sued Tallinex and its owners for 12 million, got default in court but haven't been able collect anything so far. CFTC is not very keen anymore suing out of jurisdiction entities because in most cases it hasn't been very fruitful. They are more often sending cease and desist letters to brokers who sign up US clients. There are many off shore brokers who have been successfully operating and accepting for many years. The same will happen with props.Ignored
DislikedThere are many off shore brokers who have been successfully operating and accepting for many years. The same will happen with props.Ignored
Disliked{quote} The difference here is banks may be paying millionsfor doing billions in fraud (including kickbacks to judges and authorities) I am afraid MyFF is not having that kind of money. The way they are building case I dont think as much as I like it is not coming back. Also there might be nexus of North american brokers (Like Forex.com and Oanda) which may have started this thing as their business is pretty much taken away by these prop firms
Ignored
Disliked{quote} Yes, after strict USA regulations on forex brokers, FIFO, Leverage etc( some years ago )... Canadian clients were offered accounts from Australia and UK and europe. Not sure if that happened for US residents.Ignored
Disliked{quote}-Yes. It will be interesting to see what happens. If I had to guess, regulators will try to use a different approach with props by claiming fraudulent activity. Most brokers that operate outside of jurisdictional reach of heavy-handed regulatory bodies, do so, knowing that what they are doing is perfectly legal and in accordance with the local law, where they are established. However, in the case of props, it may not be. This will be the challenge... for props to find a way to legitimize what they are doing and remain legal to ensure sustainable...Ignored
Disliked{quote} yes, he will happily pay the fines imposed on him. As far as paying to His clinets, No issues, He was and is willing to pay. He may remodel all if things happen in that way. It is all just speculation only.Ignored
Disliked{quote} They need to cease to ban people without proper evidence. When complaints pile up, the authorities will eventually react.Ignored
Disliked{quote} They need to cease to ban people without proper evidence. When complaints pile up, the authorities will eventually react.Ignored
Disliked{quote} The difference here is banks may be paying millionsfor doing billions in fraud (including kickbacks to judges and authorities) I am afraid MyFF is not having that kind of money. The way they are building case I dont think as much as I like it is not coming back. Also there might be nexus of North american brokers (Like Forex.com and Oanda) which may have started this thing as their business is pretty much taken away by these prop firms
Ignored
Disliked{quote} It will not be very difficult. Look at this forum itselfmany people are cheering because MyFF got caught and have luxurious life even though all of them heart to heart knows MyFF was paying honestly (I understand they have slippage issue but think of it as cost of running business). If MyFF is having so many haters almost all prop firms will have haters CFTC should not have any problem if they want to sue others.
Ignored
Disliked{quote} But imagine you did like that, you started with a 50/60$ fee and now you were at a 100K MFF account. You would have lost months of your life to end up with nothing. On the other hand whoever started with 100K challenges some months ago probably collected several nice payouts until all this busted. I'm more favorable in dividing the risk by several companies than starting small. (not now, obviously, now I think it's not advisable to buy anything until we see more developments)Ignored
Disliked{quote} It will not be very difficult. Look at this forum itselfmany people are cheering because MyFF got caught and have luxurious life even though all of them heart to heart knows MyFF was paying honestly (I understand they have slippage issue but think of it as cost of running business). If MyFF is having so many haters almost all prop firms will have haters CFTC should not have any problem if they want to sue others.
Ignored
Disliked{quote} They were not even Banned ,, and still continue to do it Everyday.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Yes this is a real issue with the longer term funded traders or perhaps more so to those who just recently got funded and might miss out on recovery of participation fee and percentage take of the funded account. However, we all knew we were dealing in a grey area so it is what it is.... Masterrmind ..........Ignored
Disliked{quote} But for me l believe Kazmi is Gonna Pay the fine and come back right ,He Really loved this Business l guess even though something was being Cooked behind the Doors,, it's same like the Big Banks who manipulate Prices almost everyday in the Markets.Ignored