Russia's Lavrov: Sending peacekeepers to Ukraine may lead to direct confrontation between Russia and NATO

Russia's Lavrov: Sending peacekeepers to Ukraine may lead to direct confrontation between Russia and NATO

RUSSIA'S LAVROV SAYS SENDING PEACEKEEPERS TO UKRAINE MAY LEAD TO DIRECT CONFRONTATION BETWEEN RUSSIA AND NATO
— First Squawk (@FirstSquawk) March 23, 2022

Comments / Top
Subscribe

Mar 23, 2022 4:56am

It's time these Russians being put in there place. When gaining the upper hand I hope the Ukrainians will kill each and every bastard.

bogdan11

Mar 23, 2022 7:19am

Permalink

Putin and this stoodgie Lavrov are just criminals, needs to be brought to justice.

mkjenna

Mar 23, 2022 10:37am

Permalink

Quoting turnip15

Disliked

Peace keepers ? Can a non Nato country seek peacekeeper intervention from a nato country? In any event it seems Putin will pulverise Ukraine THEN enter peacekeeping talks on its' terms. And assuming Russian troops go home after knocking shit out of the Ukrainians peacekeeping discussions may arise. Russians will most likely secure the country or large swathes rather than go home. If so then Russia may have a Vietnam or Afghanistan on its' doorstep requiring large military and expensive presence. And of course more deaths on both side. There is a...

Ignored

I don't think anyone but Lavrov is considering the possibility of NATO taking on a peace keeping mission in Ukraine. Such a mission (which is unlikely in itself) would have to originate out of a UN resolution, and would probably be under the command of a neutral sovereign. Anyway, not gonna happen.

turnip15

Mar 23, 2022 8:08am

Permalink

Peace keepers ? Can a non Nato country seek peacekeeper intervention from a nato country?
In any event it seems Putin will pulverise Ukraine THEN enter peacekeeping talks on its' terms. And assuming Russian troops go home after knocking shit out of the Ukrainians peacekeeping discussions may arise. Russians will most likely secure the country or large swathes rather than go home. If so then Russia may have a Vietnam or Afghanistan on its' doorstep requiring large military and expensive presence. And of course more deaths on both side.
There is a lot of talk here about the bravery of the Ukranians which is true, but they are heavily outnumbered and sheer numbers will wear them down. Most ( not all) wars are won on numerical superiority.

joyny

Mar 24, 2022 2:27am — Edited

Permalink

Quoting miser772

Disliked

{quote} biden dosent even have the keys to the US nuclear arms. Maybe you dont like New York after all?

Ignored

you from west dont understand how to talk with Putin. never show fear. be ready to go all in. till the end. tell you ready to explode the entire planet. that will remove any further bulshit from Putin and he starts negotiate more realistic. Now Putin tell "i do nuclear war" and west in fear... no fear.

Quote

Disliked

With more than 6,300 warheads, Russia has the world's largest nuclear arsenal. Within NATO, the United States has the largest nuclear force, with about 5,800 nuclear warheads. France is said to have almost 300 warheads, and the UK allegedly has about 215

dustbin

Mar 23, 2022 7:20am

Permalink

Quoting traupro

Disliked

Start WWIII ???

Ignored

If you are being attacked what are you going to do? Try to avoid being killed? right? So, even if you don't want war and the neighbors attacks you then you either surrender or fight. What should we do?

joyny

Mar 23, 2022 6:23am

Permalink

so it be. let's confront..

turnip15

Mar 23, 2022 7:55am

Permalink

China is the winner here. Standing aside to pick up the pieces. Any war with nato and Russia will see China watching from the sidelines and profiting from the conclusion of hostilities.