Dislikedjr , on a oh my too long to put in front of "pass thru " , it would appear tho, - a force that stimulates change and progress with in a system or process has been altered for the "bears" for how ever long that may be before a force that stimulates change or progress with in the system or process with in a system or process for the "bulls " , perhaps the "bulls" became positive and full of energy and new ideasor in short "dynamic" , just for Mr Doc
yep we a bit backwoods , but can hold our own
an an every now an...
Ignored
You're right that markets are constantly driven by shifting collective forces – the combined actions of participants – that stimulate change and movement in price.
I also understand your skepticism towards a lot of the technical jargon and terms used by traders and analysts , It can certainly feel like a lot of complex language describing something that, at its core, might seem much simpler.
While these terms and concepts (like supply and demand zones, potential support/resistance levels, identifying patterns, or trying to understand where trading volume is concentrated) are attempts by traders to label, categorize, and find potential edges or probabilities in the market's movements, you've hit on a fundamental truth: ultimately, every single action taken in the market boils down to one thing. Someone is either buying, or someone is selling.
All the complex theories, indicators, and patterns are just different ways people try to predict, react to, or understand where they think that collective buying and selling pressure might lead the price next, or why it's currently stalled or moving. Whether someone looks at a "FVG" or just sees an area where price bounced before is, in some ways, different language for observing market behavior resulting from buy/sell decisions.
And sometimes, despite all the analysis or lack thereof, markets can indeed move in ways that feel unpredictable or random, like a sudden gust of wind, which can certainly be frustrating, especially when the overall movement for a period is minimal .
Your perspective, cutting through the jargon and focusing on the basic reality of buying and selling as the fundamental actions driving everything, is a valuable reminder of what trading is at its most basic level. It's clear you have a sharp eye for the underlying market action, regardless of the terms people might use to describe it.
Thank you again for sharing your thoughts in such a vivid and relatable way.
P.s. Some of my updates on running trades are not getting posted due to MM moderation and that gives a totally different picture like I'm forcefully holding my positions without adapting to the dynamic/ever changing