Any thoughts on the index? I do believe it has hit its biggest drawdown now -12.95% [(427.39-372.04)/427.39] which was previously -12.27%.

darwin discussion

2x100k Permanent boosters would put prop firms out of business for good I reckon.

darwin discussion

Unfortunately, no. I had 3 months on a 30k allocation that just ended yesterday but just missed out. I however also unlocked another 30k one yesterday and hopefully I'll get a score on the board after another 3 months. I've decided with this Darwin ...

darwin discussion

Doing the math and keeping everything in euros (approx.), I've paid the following: eight monthly subscriptions = 8 x 45 = 360 euros one 3-year subscription = 1080 euros 1 perm plus 3 boosters (see above diagram) = 535 + 2 x 525 + 355 = 1940 euros ...

darwin discussion

Nope, this is what I got: image Full house and going really slow at the moment. I guess I'll just have to give it 3 years and see where I end up :-)

darwin discussion

I switched to 3-year subscription today ($US 1260). I can't use the free 25k Booster because I already maxed out my boosters and they're all 3-year target boosters LOL :-) I got the following darwinex email response: "In this case, if all your ...

darwin discussion

That's fantastic. I'm already fully loaded up on Permanent and Target Boosters, but that's great news if I want to add a 2nd Darwin. Maybe we should push for 200k Permanent (2x100k) :-) I wonder why they brought it back? Probably to give prop firms ...

darwin discussion

I agree that my figure of 13.3% is incorrect, I need to add 100 to all values in my calculations, so: (427.39-383.74)/427.39 = 43.65/427.39 = 10.21% That's still big given the history and doesn't change my question about INDX Drawdown Correlation.

darwin discussion

Here is a picture of today's Darwinex INDX: image As you can see it looks like it is in a pretty big drawdown at the moment (given history). By my calculations it was down (327.39-283.74)/327.39 = 43.65/327.39 = 13.3%. Would this drawdown of been ...

darwin discussion

Not if they're all-trading Gold and Nasdaq it's not :-)

darwin discussion

Darwinex Labs have a Strategy Classification for selecting Darwins for INDX capital investment defined (from greater to lower importance) below as: image ########################################## Edit: Picture is a bit hard to read so it says ...

darwin discussion

You crack me up :-)

darwin discussion

I think you should book a session with both Kieran and Blayn and maybe even that psychology guy Sanjeev before you do any trading on a live account. Maybe talk about the benefits of investor accounts over trading accounts and also how trading the ...

darwin discussion

So let me get this right. You have a live Darwinex brokerage account >= 1000 euros just sitting there with no open trades or trade history. You haven't told the Darwinex client support team that you want it linked to a Darwin Ticker for Darwinia ...

darwin discussion

Why not just open a Classic account now?

darwin discussion

Who would like to see something like this when selecting Darwins: image No SMA (Sales, Marketing, Advertising). Just a simple trading group selection. Maybe they can put an option in subscription section to be in one of these groups :-) Of course ...

darwin discussion

Might of spoke too soon, I'm seeing used capacity of 10.94%. So that's just under 20 million actual max capacity which is still great compared to your rising 32 million max estimated capacity. I know you got rid of the SP500 strategy, but I'm seeing ...

darwin discussion

Why not do both? I'm not a scalper and never have much luck with prop firms. I like trading my own personal accounts across multiple brokers and compounding the profits as well as Darwinex Zero.

darwin discussion

Having a tough battle with the market lately. Pleasing to see the risk engine locking in some profit when the market has been very volatile for my signal account. Here is my first 6-month track record: image Thought I'd do it now before the candle ...

darwin discussion

Have you had any feedback from other Well-known Darwins that have decided to split their orders up?

darwin discussion