Sounds like a bucket-shop broker without any regulation, but with the added bonus of keeping challenge fees; AKA having your cake and eating it too.

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

Good. This is what we need in this space. Thanks for sharing.

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

-Please clarify this for me. How are the trades copied over to other platforms if you do not have them open and are not relying on cloud-based solutions? Really curious about this. I am surely misunderstanding something. Thanks.

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

-Probably much easier for those that are trading futures, since many platforms have internal copying functionality. Having to run multiple instances of the same program for each account can be a little annoying, and sometimes impractical, often ...

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

-I think that this is very subjective and can vary due to many factors. Generally speaking, you let the math speak for itself and use what is available (prop-wise) as comparative analysis. But I have no opinion about what is fair or reasonable in ...

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

-I personally believe that these cross-platform trade copiers are overpriced, even when you consider server costs. They get away with it because traders are willing to pay those prices and also because there is not much competition to help bring ...

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

-Likely want to conceal and obfuscate as much proprietary information as possible in an effort to prevent copy-cat-competitors from entering the market.

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

Those that are using Duplikium (and other copiers) with prop should check the following: 1. API's are okay (with firm). 2. EA's are okay (with firm). 3. If using MT5-to-Tradovate, maybe consider using a netting-based account. 4. Copying SL/TP ...

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

-I agree with your points. They are all valid. And the 40% is my biggest problem with the model. I also wonder how they intend on segregating traders (and allocating pool) based on buy-in amount. Certainly, the idea is interesting, and is even ...

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

I haven't looked at the model, but based on what people are sharing here, it looks like a dud. No risk to the firm and they are taking 60% of all revenue? Meanwhile, traders are having to fight for the leftover crumbs; the more traders there are, ...

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

-This is also not accurate. But, it does not matter for this thread.

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

-You should know better than most that this is not accurate. Firms have different ways of doing it, though.

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

-The point is that these firms are all like casinos, in that they have a direct conflict of interest with traders. As such, traders should adjust their expectations and mitigate their risks accordingly. It does not mean that you cannot walk into a ...

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

-To a point, yes. Certainly, any firm should investigate until they know, definitively, before taking action, but I suspect that MFF knew. I personally have nothing against any firm, regardless; I understand the game. These remote props are all like ...

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

-I personally do not care much about it, but objectively speaking, if this is true, then something has to be said about MMF's decision to continue slipping them (and taking their money), in lieu of just banning the suspected accounts.

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

-Coinexx offers unlimited demo accounts. They have some plugins running to simulate live trading, but nothing will be 100% unless you actually trade a live account.

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

Wonder who will consider trading with MFF 2.0. Also wonder if Murtuza has any plans on launching a futures model.

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

-There are some positive changes, but also some negative changes that were quietly rolled out. In addition to that, some negative policies still remain. As mentioned, there are much better options available.

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

-This is what I have concluded, also. It seems that you are exactly right.

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

-Thanks. Looks like the new model is 4x that.

Prop Firm Hub 2.0