- Search Metals Mine
- Nsak3y replied Dec 7, 2024
-So they are fronting the 2.5k for the live account and are not taking that from your previously-earned profits? I do not understand the forfeit part. Thanks, again.
Prop Firm Hub
- Nsak3y replied Dec 7, 2024
-Are they funding your live accounts, or are the live accounts being funded by your profits? I'm struggling to see the benefit, but maybe I am missing something. I think, once your initial costs are covered, then the same peace of mind can be had ...
Prop Firm Hub
- Nsak3y replied Dec 6, 2024
-I'm just curious... what is the advantage of trading a live account with MFFU over trading your own account? What are they offering you? Thanks.
Prop Firm Hub
- Nsak3y replied Dec 1, 2024
-From what I have seen, the draw-down offered is typically much greater than the buy-in, so I'm not sure if it can be interpreted as simply a deposit.
Prop Firm Hub
- Nsak3y replied Nov 22, 2024
SEC Chair Gary Gensler is resigning. Meanwhile, BTC is pushing 100k. The irony is sweet. url
Prop Firm Hub
- Nsak3y replied Nov 15, 2024
-By sharing his trades. TradesViz was mentioned in one of the latest Apex 3.0 videos as a way to ensure transparency from both sides.
Prop Firm Hub
- Nsak3y replied Nov 15, 2024
-If you are referring to his profits, then it is my opinion that his profit fluctuations are not sufficient to warrant a denial. I suspect that he was denied for some other reasoning. He should be able to find out, exactly; hopefully he will ...
Prop Firm Hub
- Nsak3y replied Nov 15, 2024
-I suggested that he should share his trades. It seems that he doesn't understand the difference between closed P&L and open P&L, nor the difference between overall max loss and max loss from a single position etc..
Prop Firm Hub
- Nsak3y replied Nov 15, 2024
-Yes. He needs to show his trades, then the truth will be known. Anyone that truly believes that they did nothing wrong will not hesitate to prove their case.
Prop Firm Hub
- Nsak3y replied Oct 29, 2024
-Better to not generalize and make blanket statements. The laws (and requirements) may vary, depending on country.
Prop Firm Hub
- Nsak3y replied Oct 28, 2024
-Generally speaking, licensing and registration requirements may vary, depending on country. For US traders that are acting as investment advisor or managing a fund, other people's money and/or executing trades on behalf of others for a fee or ...
Prop Firm Hub
- Nsak3y replied Oct 23, 2024
-I suspect that they won't have to. Any internal policies that are established, although maybe not law, can be used to restrict access to non-compliant parties, essentially forcing props to fall in line. Regulation or not, this won't work if ...
Prop Firm Hub
- Nsak3y replied Oct 22, 2024
-On paper, yes. It certainly should be. In reality, though, most of the feedback seems to indicate that traders are spoiled children. We will have to see if the Apex offerings are still good enough to keep them popular.
Prop Firm Hub
- Nsak3y replied Oct 21, 2024
-Yes. I suspect that they are also shifting gears in an effort to work with exchanges/regulators and to look better on paper. It almost seems as if they are scrambling to establish some favorable paper trail of evidence with all of the recent claims.
Prop Firm Hub
- Nsak3y replied Oct 21, 2024
-$500 can be withdrawn from the safety net. At 4th payout, the safety net is no longer required; this also applies to pre-existing accounts. -This is always applicable on PA, but the draw-down allowance is used as the profit value until the safety ...
Prop Firm Hub
- Nsak3y replied Oct 21, 2024
-Yeah, I kind of figured. No worries, mate. Wishing you the best, as always.
Prop Firm Hub
- Nsak3y replied Oct 21, 2024
-I think that we may be having two, different conversations.

Prop Firm Hub
- Nsak3y replied Oct 21, 2024
-You do not think that things could play out differently? Or do you think that regulation will kill the Futures prop space, too?
Prop Firm Hub