- Search Metals Mine
-
Proximus replied Jan 20, 2014Not at all, every outcome of any trade is statistically independent from eachother.The same % of win or lose for all of them, so its more like, more trades more profit and same chance of profit. Putting NO SL is stupid, we already know that, but ...
Statistical Gambling System (High Winrate, but NO EDGE)
-
Proximus replied Jan 20, 2014BACKTESTS: Sorry for many editings and new fixes, but i had to make sure i fix every parameter.I`m happy to announce, that the V1.3 of the system can run 1 year without any loss.So its 100% winrate for year 2013-2014. Here are some backtests: 1) ...
Statistical Gambling System (High Winrate, but NO EDGE)
-
Proximus replied Jan 20, 2014UPDATE: VERSION 1.3 image Did a few backtests and optimizations, and i had to update the system DEVIATION 7 is too much and unnecessary, if the data sample is increased, then DEVIATION 6 is enough By using deviation 6 risk is reduced by atleast ...
Statistical Gambling System (High Winrate, but NO EDGE)
-
Statistical Gambling System (High Winrate, but NO EDGE)
Started Jan 20, 2014|Trading Systems|372 replies
Hi guys & girls, using my statistical knowledge i`ve put up the most optimal gambling trading ...
-
Proximus replied Jan 19, 2014Isnt that too rough? Double every month? What if you dont make it to gain profit, then you double the losses? I think its much more effective to increment the lot size in parralel with the account growth. And for this you must resize the lot size ...
$200,000 in 6 Months? What do you think about this challenge?
-
Proximus replied Jan 19, 2014After looking back my journey, at this moment i find it easy now, but back then it was so hard and sometimes i lost all hope that i will find a profitable system, but by now giving up now it become very easy.
Why do Newbies Lose?
-
Proximus replied Jan 19, 2014Thats funny, was it your money she lost? Maybe you should have taught her that there is no such thing as a no-los system. Even if some guys try it so hard with NO-SL set, its just futile. But still a clever trader can minimize his losses, and his ...
$200,000 in 6 Months? What do you think about this challenge?
-
Proximus replied Jan 19, 2014He might probably is misguided by that no SL crap promoted by Magix and his followers, but beside that, if you really have a rock solid system, its possible to make even more, but you have to let time for your capital to grow. If i say to you that ...
$200,000 in 6 Months? What do you think about this challenge?
-
Proximus replied Jan 18, 2014Not necessarly in 1 move, of course once the Bidders are too many the Askers will overwhelm them, or vice versa, but it can happen in steps.Not necessarly the price will go against you in 1 swift move or 1 candlestick. It can zig-zag down in the ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 18, 2014You want proof , fine. First of all, the math proof, since if you dont put a SL basically your RR goes down to this: TP reward / Margin Call Risk You cannot deny this, even if you manage to get the best system out there, there is still a remote ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 18, 2014Actually , use this spreadsheet to calculate what balance you will get if you have a constant growth rate. file
$200,000 in 6 Months? What do you think about this challenge?
-
Proximus replied Jan 18, 2014You dont understant, i dont trade the news, but the aftershock of it, i enter 15-30 min after the news is released and when the spreads tighten again. The momentum is still there and the edge too, of course the economic calendar's "actual" data is ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 18, 2014Congrats on your long trade journey. However i dont think time is the key factor in the experience gaining.One can trade for 20 years , learn everything about the market, and still cant make a million dollar, while others make a million in their ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 18, 2014Actually based on my theory, since the aftershock of the news create an inefficiency/ window of opportunity when the probability outcome gets biased, so the market is no longer a 50-50 probability after that. And that whatever 60-40 probability is ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 18, 2014Of course the buyers and the sellers are moving the markets, whats the problem with that, its the bear vs bull struggle, i know that way before. Besides i didnt spent much time analysing the microstructure of the market.I spent 1 year analysing ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 18, 2014Wtf man, why am i a newbie? I know more about the markets then Magix and his whole no SL brainwashed crew combined.
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 18, 2014Lol tell that to Magix and his friends.We had a nice bickering over the price predictability thread.
url $200,000 in 6 Months? What do you think about this challenge?
-
Proximus replied Jan 18, 2014No i meant with 100$
100$ -> 1.000.000$ in 1 year 3000$ -> 200.000$ in 2 years maybe$200,000 in 6 Months? What do you think about this challenge?
-
Proximus replied Jan 18, 2014Nah i`ll just use the report itself to give me the direction.After i know the outcome of the report i`ll just ride with the trend.And that trend usually has an edge

why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 18, 2014Hmm, maybe the CNY GDP report can put some pressure in the USD, since they are good trading partners. But if the market will be very flat, then i think i`ll stick with the NZD report's aftermath.I`ll just buy or sell 15-30 min after the report is ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?