-
Fed's Waller: There are reasons including AI to think the hiring may remain weak
Added at 7:29am
Added at 7:30am
Added at 7:38am
- Comments / Top
- Subscribe
Trader#C8FA
Feb 23, 2026 7:33am
Permalink
Trader#D73C
Feb 23, 2026 8:27am
Permalink
-
Related Stories
WALLER: ZERO JOB GROWTH DOES NOT SEEM LIKE A STABLE EMPLOYMENT ENVIRONMENT FED GOV WALLER Q&A/NABE: LOT OF CAPITAL GOING INTO DATA CENTERS COMING FROM SOMEWHERE ELSE; INVESTMENT OUTSIDE OF CONSTRUCTION 'GOING DOWN,' NOT UP #Waller #FederalReserve #economy FED'S WALLER: NEVER SEEN THE ECONOMY GROWING LIKE THIS WITHOUT JOBS ...
Trump Considers Targeted Strike Against Iran, Followed By Larger Attack - NYT *TRUMP OPEN TO DEPOSING AYATOLLAH BY FORCE IF IRAN STUBBORN: NYT
Thank you, Constance, and thank you for the opportunity to speak to you today. Let me commend NABE for focusing this year's conference on economic disruptions including artificial intelligence, a subject I have spoken on often lately, and which I will address again tomorrow at a Boston Fed conference. But today, I will turn to another topic that I know is of interest, the outlook for the U.S. economy and the implications for the Federal Open Market Committee's (FOMC) goals of maximum employment and stable prices. At our January meeting, the FOMC voted to hold our policy rate steady, following three 25-basis-point cuts since September. The Committee had cut rates because job gains had slowed and downside risks to employment had increased, amid somewhat elevated inflation. In my view, appropriate policy should look through tariff effects on inflation. Underlying inflation was running close to 2 percent while the labor market remained at risk, and these circumstances led me to favor another cut in January, and to dissent against the Committee's decision. I felt that the risk of a substantial downturn in the labor market combined with a limited risk of higher inflation warranted another cut, bringing the policy rate closer to a neutral setting. Even in the absence of some data due to last year's government shutdown, a factor cited by some FOMC colleagues voting to pause, the balance of risks for me were weighted toward further policy easing. FED'S WALLER: JANUARY JOBS DATA AN UPSIDE SURPRISE, IF CONTINUES IN FEBRUARY MAY BE APPROPRIATE TO KEEP RATES STEADY FED'S WALLER: NO DISMISSING WEAK JOB CREATION OF 2025, BUT ALSO TRUE THAT ECONOMIC ACTIVITY HAS BEEN STRONGER THAN EXPECTED ...