- Search Metals Mine
- 45 Results
- Nsak3y replied Feb 19, 2024
-I think, if you are going to use AI-generated profile images, then probably better to just not use any at all. image
- Nsak3y replied Feb 18, 2024
-I don't know... this feels equivalent to a drug dealer trying to start a pharmacy.
- Nsak3y replied Feb 11, 2024
-They are literally providing the means for these companies to operate, are they not? image
- Nsak3y replied Feb 8, 2024
-Some of us were already speculating about this and Meta's access to the app store as a potential driver for their recent decisions. However, what does the FCC have to do with this? Why would they be telling Meta to restrict US clients? Is this ...
- Nsak3y replied Feb 5, 2024
-Not sure about anyone else, but their website seems laggy for me. Here is a screenshot of the customizations:
- Nsak3y replied Oct 21, 2023
I have been receiving emails from this company, not sure how or why, but the emails were not getting flagged as spam and were arriving in my inbox, so I decided to try to unsubscribe. Check out how they try to hide the unsubscribe link. Also, when I ...
- Nsak3y replied Sep 6, 2023
-Maybe the plans were already in the works.
- Nsak3y replied Jun 7, 2023
-An interesting choice to use MFFX for comparing options, when some might even consider it to be the better option. image I would not be surprised if there was some association, either directly or indirectly. CEO of MFFX admitted to helping many ...
- Nsak3y replied Apr 29, 2023
Thanks. It's weird. Even their website is confusing: image I guess you can pass without any minimum requirements, but you may need to wait until the next day for funded? Not sure.
- Nsak3y replied Apr 29, 2023
-Their website states 1-day minimum for each account type and phase? Is this not the case? image
- Nsak3y replied Apr 24, 2023
-Was really hoping that this discussion had run its course. Nonetheless, the scenario that you describe is a poor way to make your argument. This is similar to comparing apples to oranges. You might as well say: "okay, let's take a $150 account ...
- Nsak3y replied Apr 22, 2023
-Just looking at your FAQ section again, as things keep changing. Now it seems that you no longer refund the customization fees? Why??? This is not the first time that you have decided to change things, seemingly on a whim, without notifying ...
- Nsak3y replied Feb 11, 2023
-Okay. I see many people here complaining about slippage when trading with these prop firms. I have made a simple trade panel for MT5, that will hopefully help with that. This trade panel uses limit entry orders by default, as well as allows you to ...
- Nsak3y replied Jan 24, 2023
-Yes. -As I understand it, yes. However, this only applies to the phase-1 challenge, not the phase-2 verification. Also, you must select this option before you begin the challenge, if I recall correctly. These guys are really sneaky, so watch out. ...
- Nsak3y replied Jan 7, 2023
-I think that he was just using it as an example to illustrate his point. But that being said, regardless of the account balance, everyone must determine their own risk-tolerance and allowable risk-per-trade, whether that's 1% or 2% etc.. The ...
- Nsak3y replied Nov 3, 2022
-Depends on the person, but I suspect that the biggest issue for most was the lot size limits being removed and the ability to use a trade copier. image
- Nsak3y replied Oct 27, 2022
-Agreed. Unfortunately, when trying to do so, I was banned from their discord within 30-seconds after asking if the rule even existed. And then there is this (no denial of said rule): image
- Nsak3y replied Oct 25, 2022
-1. Yes, they are very new. They are still updating their website/offers it seems, so I would personally hold off on trading with them for a bit until they get all of their ducks in a row and have some payout proofs. They do have a public forum and ...
- Nsak3y replied Oct 19, 2022
-A very surprising update regarding this issue (lot exposure consistency rule removed for funded accounts): image I think that this says a lot about Traders With Edge firm.