- Search Metals Mine
- 92 Results
- CLTrader replied Apr 30, 2024
Yeah, Uncle Sam doesn't allow its taxpayers to trade CFD's.
- CLTrader replied Dec 28, 2023
Thanks RP! I was missing the HA 8 indicator.
- CLTrader replied Dec 26, 2023
Rocky, If it's not too much trouble, could you post your NT8 chart template file to the forum? Thanks so much.
- CLTrader replied Sep 13, 2021
Bill, just one comment on trading options. You can do plain vanilla buy calls for longs, buy puts for shorts by day trading the current weekly at-the-money option for stocks with good volatility and liquidity characteristics. Base your option entry ...
- CLTrader replied Aug 7, 2021
RP, Thanks. I'm very surprised you're letting your students trade the NQ instead of the MNQ. With you directly over their shoulders, yes. But if you leave a beginner to his/her own devices, that contract shows no mercy for hesitation in not taking ...
- CLTrader replied Aug 5, 2021
aud, "Have you noticed if there is a benefit over that as opposed to just requiring a close above the 3 previous candles highs? " Higher likelihood you won't have to wait through pullbacks if you use the high/low of the 4th candle to be taken out. ...
- CLTrader replied Aug 4, 2021
rockypoint, I don't know if you followed up on dazw2311's 3 bar break fractal system in conjunction with yours, but I can say firsthand that it is a great system for the 1 min US e-mini futures. They're volatile enough to where you don't need to ...
- CLTrader replied Apr 12, 2021
If you like this method on Forex, you will love it on the US E-mini futures. The Nasdaq e-mini (symbol NQ) moves so well that a 4th bar close in the right direction on the 15 sec, 30 sec and 1 min charts is enough to take the trade the majority of ...
- CLTrader replied Nov 18, 2019
Speaking of the Hang Seng Index futures, its 1st hour range in Monday's morning session was 369 pts!
- CLTrader replied Oct 10, 2019
All these charts show that the better risk/reward is to take the trade AT the pullback to the first moving average tap.
- CLTrader replied Sep 23, 2019
OP says, "show me ONE SINGLE SUCCESSFUL TRADER (for at least 3 years in a row) and I promise I'll be the second one" That's easy. His name is Ross Cameron. Trades stocks under $10 in the U.S. He makes his statements available on his website. He ...
- CLTrader replied Aug 20, 2019
I would bet anything the prior video speaker doesn't trade for a living, or retirement enhancement, as RP does. He's spent all of his time polishing his presentations for YouTube subscribe numbers income and who knows what else he happens to sell. I ...
- CLTrader replied Jul 2, 2019
You can show winner after winner. But, like I said, if your avg win rate drops below 70% long-term, your account will eventually be wiped out. Is Nadex still doing that nice little trick where, if you're in-the-money within the last minute, the ...
- CLTrader replied Jul 1, 2019
The big problem with Nadex is the huge bid/ask spread on every trading instrument they have. If forces you to have 70%+ winning pcts, on avg, in order to win in the long-term. The amount you're trying to make per day has nothing to do with how Nadex ...
- CLTrader replied Jun 26, 2019
Please post the source code. I'd like to translate the code to NinjaTrader 7 and then test it on some 1 min futures. Thanks.
- CLTrader replied Jun 15, 2019
Low volatility is the main reason, IMO. Forex isn't consistently volatile enough. If it were, you could make a living trading a 1 min chart 2 hours a day. You can do that on the US e-mini futures or the HSI/HHI futures in Hong Kong. You can have ...
- CLTrader replied Jun 10, 2019
ichikuse, You and RP have the patience of Saints. That +41.9 is less than 5 mins of price action on the NQ e-mini futures during its morning session these days.
- CLTrader replied Jun 2, 2019
Martingale trading systems don't work in the long-term. This is a fact. There are many serious probability books written on the subject. I suggest you find a way to trade where your win rate falls between 40-60% and your reward to risk ratio falls ...
- CLTrader replied May 17, 2019
0.33 per side for the micros is a very good price. Interactive Brokers in the US charges 0.47. alcol, yes, spread betting is just another phrase for CFD. Two interesting notes. Interactive Brokers is a highly reputable international brokerage firm. ...
- CLTrader replied May 16, 2019
CFD places in Europe / Australia were already encountered in the US in the late 1800's / early 1900's. They were known as bucket shops. The Wiki page explains it: "Bucket shop" is a defined term in the many U.S. states that criminalize the operation ...