Thanks, and we are waiting to see your updated "thing", hoho. I seem to find that raising the multiply factor can increase win/loss size ratio than raising the starting lotsize. if we use X 1.5, when death trade comes (or even TP), the potential ...

Nanningbob 60x90 EA

right now i'm not sure how many pairs to trade is safe. for my 2000$, i think that 10 pairs or so (most at 5min/15min), and X4. might be ok. in fact, i should've use X 5 with 0.01 start at IBFX. but i'm timid somehow. believe it or not, if you use X ...

Nanningbob 60x90 EA

by the way, when multiply factor is = or < than 2, with Bob's default setting, there is no profit when 4th level TP reached. I think that your 5min TF is a key to avoid the risk. However, lower multiply number may not be profitable. Please note ...

Nanningbob 60x90 EA

In fact, contrary to what ppl think about the "Multiply Factor", the bigger number we use, the safer we'll be. For example, if we X 2 for every another level, we'll lose after 4th level TP reach. if we X 3 as we do right now, we'll get a profit when ...

Nanningbob 60x90 EA

I guess that this is the only golden idea over the weekend. however, did you mean 0.1, 0.15, and 0.375 vs original 0.1, 0.3, and 0.9? actually, something like Fibonacci series could possibly be a better way..... or give you 10 levels, but only x2, ...

Nanningbob 60x90 EA

First of all, many thanks for Musashi for sharing a great system. I have a question: Isn't that Bollinger repaints itself all the time so that a bar cannot close beyond Bollinger's range? Other than this problem, the system might be easy to code as ...

Breakout System

Live testing for 100/200 will be too time consuming, say, for one pair, there may not be more than 1 trade per week. why not run a simple backtest even in MT4 to get a basic idea (ok, it is not as real as real world) how this 100/200 may perform? ...

Nanningbob 60x90 EA

more than 200% in 3 days? what the heck? I only earned 8$ this week so far, i sxxk. how did you realise that? by using 0.1 lot as 1st level? Teach me, please. However, CX007, I have been asked myself many times, if one could double his/her money ...

Nanningbob 60x90 EA

So this A6_2.mq4 is the EA that lys.forex posted statements about? what's lys.forex's purpose?

I have 2 Great Systems

I am pretty sure that this EA is loyal to both 1st post and the EMAcrossSignal.mq4 that dreamliner provided. however, it is not that profitable, and with large drawdowns. EA is here, anyone interested, may backtest and improve it. Use defaults, ...

Simplest Daily EMA Cross System

Please see the attached chart. On 2008 July 25 00:01 AM, the EMA crossed on the previous day (July 24th, with a red arrow on top). So in July 25's 1st minute, the system entered a short trade. That day, as you can see (with a red vertical line), is ...

Simplest Daily EMA Cross System

I believe that I coded the EA right. But the backtests show that it is far from being profitable according to the original rules. I'll upload the EA after I get it right. Now it is a junk. I don't know what my EA's problem is. One question: If I ...

Simplest Daily EMA Cross System

I'd try that after EA is coded. Bear with me, please.

Simplest Daily EMA Cross System

Haven't finished reading the thread....... However, firstly thanks to Dreamliner for this great contribution. It looks simple, but therefore it looks promising. IS THERE AN EA MADE YET??? if not, i can make one right away. let me know....

Simplest Daily EMA Cross System

you liar, you must be boasting. but I did laugh.

Silent Service Method

My Dumb Prediction, True or False, take it as a joke. Today's GBPUSD will be a typical death trade: a straight down without a good retrace for this system, then during U.S evening later, it will be in a narrow range (maybe 30~40 pips wide), still no ...

Nanningbob 60x90 EA

OK, if interested, use the attached EA, overwrite previous same-name EA. Now, in settings, "TRUE_TP" is your true TP, "Takeprofit" is a stupid large TP number set for IBFX to sneakview. Your postions will be closed when TRUE_TP is reached, or ...

Nanningbob 60x90 EA

I fully support your comments. Backtest is a must. sometimes we cannot get good test results from MT4, but that doesn't mean backtest is not useful. On the contrary, backtest is the prerequisite/necessary condition for a robust system. Only closing ...

Nanningbob 60x90 EA

Bob, I have an impression that 5m trading is much safer than 1H trading. In other words, 5m system has much less entries than 1H system. This is based on my backtest and observation. However, according to your comments, seemingly my impression is ...

Nanningbob 60x90 EA

When setting the parameters for the EA, you put an incredibly large number, say 300, instead of the default 60. [quote=Bioquim;2579556]

Nanningbob 60x90 EA