What? That does not make sense. I don't think any of us are using the same method anyway. The true method is EURUSDD's method. Everybody is too scared to share their "secret", for some reason, so we are all just guessing. Anything we think EURUSDD ...

A delicate secret

Just for giggles, I took an MTF view of EURJPY just now. The 4HR chart recently shows 3 areas of revisiting. 139.96 139.26 With a lower level at 138.83. image The interesting thing is, only 139.26 shows up in multiple timeframes. So, is 139.26 the ...

A delicate secret

Thanks handy. That is my problem... so many ideas, so little time. Carl

A delicate secret

I definitely would not use a target on a daily or weekly... however, a bias short or long is an interesting idea that just popped into my head... So, if you can list all open targets on all the timeframes... maybe you can come up with a directional ...

A delicate secret

And I re-iterate...

A delicate secret

That is why I think it is essential that all timeframes are accounted for. If you have a long trade for a target for 20 pips, but there is a short target underneath your long 80 pips away on a higher timeframe, are you going to take that trade? Are ...

A delicate secret

Umm, why do you need stops? You know where price is going... eventually.

A delicate secret

I didn't quite spell it out. Should I delete it? Carl

A delicate secret

I think that is great if we are doing it differently, as long as it works. You are probably using the info from EURUSDD other thread on similarity? I'm trying to get my head around using the multiple timeframe strategy. It does seem to work on all ...

A delicate secret

Here is the EURUSD 1-min. Sorry, only one. I'm at work, so i'm posting this on the down-low... Carl

A delicate secret

I'm looking through all timeframes down to the 1-min... Quite impressive, even through this news cycle. Carl

A delicate secret

I have that as well. Carl PS. 1.3659 is still unfinished (1-min chart).

A delicate secret

You can give 10 people the "holy grail", 8 of them will lose money using it. Carl

A delicate secret

SET1 = Bar sequences with counts SET2 = FRACTAL PATTERNS SET3 = Bar sequences with counts (SET1) that are in SET2 (filtered by SET2). In essence, we are reducing SET1, by only including bar patterns that are also FRACTAL patterns. We preserve how ...

Fractals, ZZ & the Pissing Dog

I don't exactly understand what to do with error predictions, and my method has not been completely hashed out yet. What I can gather, is that G adds the patterns (into his database) that are predicted within 3 bars of exact (per zigzag standards). ...

Fractals, ZZ & the Pissing Dog

Ralome, I wouldn't read to much into that... Yes, he was 1 bar premature in his explanation. I queried my database for "01" with 6 bars. The exact pattern was not found, but a lower longer match was found "010". So, in essence he was correct, but ...

Fractals, ZZ & the Pissing Dog

Ok... I'm with you now. To date, my algo uses the last 13 bars as input to the "next bar" section, no matter where we are in the current zigzag. That may have to be re-visited as an area for study/confirmation. I just queried my database for "0000" ...

Fractals, ZZ & the Pissing Dog

That one bar swing is equal to 4 bars previous to it... Search "0" fractal. 4 bar length. Next bar... Carl PS. We questioned G about how he could get a signal on the very next bar... his answer about using ATR5 to modify search length shed some ...

Fractals, ZZ & the Pissing Dog

Yes, that is the way I understand it. Those bars that are longer than the average make the zigzag finish quicker, so we have to add length to conform to any "normal" zigzags that don't have abnormally long bars. In effect we are "normalizing" our ...

Fractals, ZZ & the Pissing Dog

It is my position, that you should not manipulate the bar patterns to something it is not, ie. a '0' to '000'. Only the zigzag length (in the database) should contain an extra modifier. I am adding an "AddToLength" variable to each zigzag as my ...

Fractals, ZZ & the Pissing Dog