Or long eurusd, gbpjpy, audusd, nzdjpy, while short eurjpy, gbpusd, audjpy, nzdusd at the same time? so that this 8 pairs are a balanced basket.

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

one night is not sufficient to conclude. the latest EA requires a breakout on GJ price to enter, but last night till now is a typical ranging period.

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

nice idea, similar to mine. this is very essential to keep us from immediate re-entry. i drag it to test now, but change a little from: if(High[1] < High[0]) BuyCondition5 = True; else BuyCondition5 = False; to ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Sorry, i was not clear enough. 50 pips divided/ 14 pairs = 4 pips approximately. usually 14 pairs not moving same size, GJ may go against you 10 pips, while eurchf moved only 1 pip. but this is enough to kick us out of the trend. so we often see ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Not wanting to lurking here waiting for the final product, but i chose to stand aside these few days because to me, the EA's major issue seems persist: "Keep re-entering due to tight profit-lock (the first few steps of P-L is like trailing stop of 7 ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

this might be a very simple issue. i'm not a english native speaker, so maybe something i said was wrong, lost in translation. Don, could you please be NOT so upset? everyone is hoping to solve the problem. that's the core. what's been argued about ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

i'm sorry for pissing you off, Don. There is no hard feeling anyway, and not necessarily beneficial to anyone, man. i uploading my edition of your EA will simply cause more confusion/unhappiness :-). that's why i didn't...... i think that i was not ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Don, it cannot be in Kos' court, that EA keeps re-entering in a different manner as Kos did and told. we need to deal with that re-entry issue. again, not saying who is wrong, i'm saying that a BI cross with a life of several hours is wrong.

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Many thanks, very useful! my recommendation, try set every pair's period as 2 (cannot be 1, 2 is minimum) so that the color basically reflects latest market conditions. and for USDCHF, set "inverse strength" = true . remove gbpchf, and eurchf. you ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Oh, man, i was actually asking you what this indicator is or where to get it. thanks.

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

what's your attached image to show?

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Robert, that's very insightful, and i agree this is the way to go. and Trend Magic or SuperTrend should be a better indicator than MACD to alert trend reverse and stopout the basket. but in order NOT to interfere the default algorithm, we can set ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

at this point, you do need Kos to clarify these issues. i still believe that re-entry logic after a few hours is not what Kos did or intended.

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Don, yes, i agree that we are not changing the rules. what i suggest is definitely following Kos way. As to 4 conditions lined-up together, there could be another way to code it. 1. imho, BI cross is the major indicator, well, if it is not, doesn't ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Robert, your consideration on profit-lock value kept by GlobalVar is very needed if we go LIVE with the EA. That's assuming the reconnection time interval is pretty long, like a few minutes. Also, there should be a subroutine put on a hard stoploss ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

Great, Robert, I'm replacing with this version now. Let's stick to this format and logic flow, i'm getting familiar with the code after i read a few times now. Please note me/us if any major change/editing is done in future. as to MACD ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

@ Don and MrPip geee, this is 4th time or 5th time that i have to post about the bug in void T101_CloseAll(). i refrain myself posting another of my own edition, cos none test it although it correct this closeall() problem. 1. suppose we have 20 pos ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

if Don had support from MT4 guru like you, ZZ, the code doesn't have to spread like this. just sometimes we tend to get desperate when picking bugs. i found even a perfectly Alpari EA will suck ass when running on IBFX. these kinds of problems ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

yeah, definitely. i second this. i found quite a few readers showing up suddenly within last 48 hours. without too much mediation, they provide some other creative ideas----let's NOT to. let's focus on clean the logic of the EA of Don and MrPip, ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method

for the reversal from last hour to current hour. MrPip's 06-09-10 version shows MACD/Signal cross, then EA should've instantly close the basket. However, it didn't. It closed the basket about 40 minutes later, when the stoploss is hit. This happened ...

Indicators development for T101's not very simple method