- Search Metals Mine
-
Proximus replied Jan 8, 2014Sorry i forgot that you are the resident troll in every thread, too sad .... As i said many times, if you dont believe me test it, every statement can be tested for its truthfullness.What i stated is tested stuff, the fractalness of the market is a ...
How many trades until a system is proven, not just lucky?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014I think its more visible on the line chart, just found a few on M15, its very very frequent and it can be seen way better on the line chart
image image why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014It is nice to see that more people are aware of it.But this will interest you very much, this pattern is ever better than i thought, just by my visual skills, i marked all the boob patterns on your chart, there were more than you thought. So it is ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014Draw boobs on the chart thats a good one

Actually it was an ass, but whatever, if it could be profitable than i can rename myself as the new bad-ass trader 
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014You have a point there, but until i analyse the pattern more deeper i cannot say anything certain about it.
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014I cannot say anything certain until i quantify it somehow and analyse it deeply, but for now i think its a volatility breakout type scenario. The fact that you seen many breakouts which didnt faded is 1 thing, but maybe it had different ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014That is why we have to quantify it, i just marked the patterns which looks like this, but to be propertly analyzed we must quantify it. As for the method of trading, you didnt understand it, we dont trade the price after, we trade the pattern ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014Well its hard to tell what differentiates this particular pattern from other U,V,M , double top, head & shoulder type patterns, but its even harder to quantify it.I think i should open a new thread about this where we can discuss it better. I dont ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014The fact that it can be exploited is good enough.Just let us give positive expectancy and we should not care more. Ok i will reread your post, i`m sorry if i didnt remembered it well it was a few weeks ago.
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014Well because this thread is about price -predictability and i just showed a pattern that repeats, this can be a +1 to predictability vs total randomness. The pattern starts with a big breakout and the price gets back to equilibrium after, so we ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014I dont know, that is why i thought we should discuss it. It is a breakout pattern so we have to adjust the SL and the TP according to the volatility. But the pattern itself repeats too much so we have to trade it.Its a clear sign of market ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014If you worry about spread just go on higher timeframe.As for RR, thats another topic, i`m sure there is atleast 1 optimal way to trade this pattern to get positive expectancy out of it. Its just too frequent to just ignore it, it appears almost ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014Ok before i get ignored by more people lets get back to topic again, i dont like to criticize people, but when its necessary then its necessary. ----------------------- So you guys said that you dont have much confidence in single candle patterns, ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014I think you can classify yourself to be in the "troll" category.You come here bitching people while you are the one who didnt posted a single useful post here not the others.I`m sorry but thats the truth. As for the TF problem, yes, i didnt said it ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014Talk for yourself, i may had a few dumb posts in this thread, but the majority was useful.My pattern theory and random-ness of the market theories can be tested at any time.Of course i cannot talk for others, the fact that some guys come here only ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014I meant on backtesting, on forward test of course its impossible, but on backtest its possible.Just get a big database of historical data, and trade on lower timeframes to have enough samples. If your system works on D1 it should work on M5 too, not ...
How many trades until a system is proven, not just lucky?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014Maybe you cant comprehend it, read every word again, its true, if you trade patterns, they work better on higher timeframe than on lower, i didnt made up this, its a fact, if you dont believe me check it yourself. I`m profitable too, and I have an ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014I dont know for other strategies, but for patterns, the higher you go the better results will you get.Because the trend and the momentum of price is stronger at higher timeframes, so a hammer is stronger at H1 than on M1, just as it is told by my ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 7, 2014Maybe i should have tested it on the next 2-3 candles to have atleast a momentum to work with.Maybe 1 candle is just not the deal, but i found a few patterns which had better expectancies but were made of more than just 1 candle.The hammer and other ...
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?
-
Proximus replied Jan 6, 2014Its higher than 0, thats already something, the best pair on H1 it had 0.1 i guess, meaning that for every 1€ position size you profit on average 10 eurocent.
why have you accepted the price-predictability assumption?