Awesome..yes, we got better entry on 15 Min. Since I am doing breakdowns on 5 min without any multi time frame alignment I didn’t include that but yes it’s perfect trade.

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Trade Breakdown — as always, every possible setup included Trade 1: 0R (Came very close to 1.96R but reversed back to breakeven) Trade 2: -1R Trade 3: -1R (Not an ideal trade but for all practical purposes and considering worst case scenario.) Trade ...

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

We can see the price struggling, and a buy signal has appeared on the 5-minute chart. At this point, we have a few options: close the trade for a small profit, move the stop to break-even, or let it run based on the original 15-minute signal. image ...

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Another decent setup... can re enter now image

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Awesome.. And yes we go again tomorrow

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

That took us out... but immediately got an entry on 15 min.... Multi timeframe conformation would have saved us but it is what it is image

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Another setup.. lets see how it plays out price almost tapped basis line already.. image

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Continue... I’ve read your replies more than once — not to argue, but to make sure I’m not missing something. And to be honest, the so-called “improvements” you’re suggesting seem rooted more in belief than testing. You speak with certainty, as if ...

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Lol.... I missed this beauty while replying to some comment on the thread image

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Thanks for your feedback — I’m always open to critical thinking, but it’s important we keep things fair and objective. First, the example you used to discredit the system feels exaggerated and selectively framed. In fact, on that very same day and ...

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Indeed, it worked great..

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Perfect trade...Take profit hit image

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Valid setup.. let's see how it plays out image

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

100% agree... At 5% a month on a $200k account, you’re winning. Simple as that.

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Trade Breakdown — as always, no cherry-picking Trade 1: -1R Trade 2: -1R (Not an ideal trade. We did see a liquidity sweep with a wick and a bullish candle — could’ve been a decent entry. But to avoid hindsight bias, we’ll count it as a loss. Still ...

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

image

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Beautiful trade.... image

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Slightly confused with the indicators on chart.... but below would be the entry.. and Its a breakeven image

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Ohh man.. you are killing it... 3R yesterday and 3R today...

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Absolutely.. true, even without any filters taking all the valid trades would still be profitable...

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based