- Search Metals Mine
-
triphop replied Jul 23, 2010You don't get anywhere without being a bit cheeky I guess - but no chance. Not for free and not for sale. I've already analysed the data to death - so when I say that the reason that they're on the wrong side of the market is predominantly down to ...
Why are most retail traders usually on the wrong side of the market?
-
triphop replied Jul 19, 2010Well you know what they say about guesswork Pip. I'll leave you to it

Why are most retail traders usually on the wrong side of the market?
-
triphop replied Jul 19, 2010Sure. Oanda's a proxy for the whole retail market. And the whole area of losing traders...
Why are most retail traders usually on the wrong side of the market?
-
triphop replied Jul 19, 2010It's my special proprietary indicator which i'll be selling for a one-off fee. Or ... hold on a minute: http://fxtradeinfocenter.oanda.com/orderbook/open_orders_and_positions use aggregate positioning to work out % of profitable and non. And for ...
Why are most retail traders usually on the wrong side of the market?
-
triphop replied Jul 19, 2010Yeah well it's definitely the most popular, but that doesn't affect the overall percentage, though it's certainly the scalper's favourite, and so the spread would be a bigger factor in why so many are on the losing side. 56% was probably the % ...
Why are most retail traders usually on the wrong side of the market?
-
triphop replied Jul 19, 2010No assumption Cindy, I calculated it. EU is still the least profitable pair in retail by a long chalk. It's not all traders - it's their aggregate position, which is disproportionately affected by those trading with almighty drawdowns.
Why are most retail traders usually on the wrong side of the market?
-
triphop replied Jul 19, 2010Now this is a question... — Deep breath. So... retailers do spend most of the time in drawdown - on EU we're talking about 99% of the time (real figures, not billy bullshit). I've got around 18 months of retail data now. Since I last wrote ...
Why are most retail traders usually on the wrong side of the market?
-
triphop replied Jul 16, 2010Spot on Kiwi. Oldmaster, it's not a stupid idea at all, though one we've all had a some point or other. Most people seem to think that the retail punter is simply a victim of overleveraging and shitty risk management. While that's undoubtedly true, ...
What is your edge?
-
triphop replied Jun 29, 2010Good to hear Petra. 6 more months and you can start caning it!
Make or Break Year for Petra!
-
triphop replied Jun 24, 2010About 20% ish according to their estimates Interestingly, FX is becoming more speculative, not less.
algorithmic trading in forex
-
triphop replied Jun 22, 2010If you want to protect your capital, stick it under your mattress. The answer should only be about one single question - does it improve profits? Whereas, as XT rightly says, it's often because it makes traders feel more comfortable. Illusion of ...
Moving Stop to B/E (Break Even) Discussion
-
triphop replied Jun 20, 2010Jasus - you hit the nail on the proverbial head. You could wipe off billions off the NHS annual bill if people understood the connection between the mind and a multitude of persistent, chronic illnesses. Back pain and RSI rates would fall overnight. ...
Lower back pain and your forex chair...
-
triphop replied Jun 18, 2010BRB, in short, I agree. Velocity=speed=pips over time. Actual volume is impossible to measure, so tick volume is used as a proxy by some for real volume. But tick volume is v.v.v. tightly correlated to OHLC data, which you can see on a normal ...
Difference between speed, momentum and volume??
-
triphop replied Jun 18, 2010Ignorant, arrogant and patronising. That's got to be a hattrick. If timeframe affects profitability (it does), adjust position size accordingly. If it doesn't, don't. It's that simple.
Position Size vs Time Frame
-
triphop replied Jun 13, 2010Can I back it up... what, here in public?
In short though, yes I do use that measure (efficiency ratio as Rabid described it) as to the degree of trending. It does have limitations, eg you can be moving in direction of trend and yet volatility > ...Position Size vs Time Frame
-
triphop replied Jun 13, 2010OK sure... but I'm not talking about your reasons for entry, be they a 5 min chart or what have you. If timeframes were irrelevant, the probabilities of a random entry, ignoring the spread, on a 1:3 trade would be equal whether you're risking 1 pip ...
Position Size vs Time Frame
-
triphop replied Jun 12, 2010Not according to my watch they're not...
Mathematically, the hourlies are very different to the dailies. The hourlies range more than they trend, the dailies trend more than they range. This tells you one important thing - you cannot trade the ...Position Size vs Time Frame
-
triphop replied Jun 10, 2010Pretty simple — Not a lot too mine - there are those which are essential for trading - account size, % at risk on one trade and how much this means in ££, £ / pip (based on SLs), contract size, but the one that holds golden position at the top ...
Statistics to Trade By
-
triphop replied Jun 4, 2010Interesting cheers Rabid, will take a look at that over the weekend. As for IFR - they are about as accurate as those UBS S/R levels that get published. Sometimes surprisingly accurate, others, way off target. From this morning for eg: [04:05 GMT ...
On the topic of BS in trading forums...
-
triphop replied Jun 4, 2010I know... it's pretty grizzly. I started a while back here: url My maths wasn't up to scratch to reproduce a Garch model, so I modelled EWMA - and it came out as slightly worse than a simple ATR. Typical. It does seem logical IVs should be better ...
On the topic of BS in trading forums...