all your knowledge is fictional. you have made it up or read it somewhere on a conspiracy blog. I have every reason to believe you are living on government benefits and can't believe someone as fictional as you can manage to hold down a job. unless ...

Are trading costs the main reason of losses in trading?

sure they do but are mandated to operate within the regulatory framework and reporting false information would be in breach and they will be fined or potentially lose their licence to operate, not to mention reputational damage and its effects on ...

Are trading costs the main reason of losses in trading?

that is 99.9999 stat you are pulling out your ass. the stat I am quoting comes from brokers according to regulatory requirements. maybe you should just leave this forum because you clearly don't know what you are talking about. I don't live a lavish ...

Are trading costs the main reason of losses in trading?

the market is fluid, not rigid. waiting for stops or targets to be hit is a rookie mistake. the market doesn't care about your arbitrary stops or targets it only cares about information flow which is in a constant state of flux. a trader that ...

5% risk per trade?

if you take a trade and your stop gets hit that isn't a a transaction cost its a loss. just under 80 percent of retail traders lose because they don't know what they are doing. it has nothing to do with transaction costs.

Are trading costs the main reason of losses in trading?

that has to be one of the worst ways to trade news. Its like flipping a coin except an 18 pip stop can flick either way in moments. Understand what's going on fundamentally and trade accordingly instead this dangerous inconsistent method.

Central Banks & Big Players

maybe you didn't read what I said earlier where I clearly stated I have no preference for either. if someone backs away from a fight it doesn't mean he is weak. if anything the Japanese are less inclined to start a fight and seagul trained with ...

8 Years Later - Still Not Winning

van dam only earned 1 degree while seagal earned 7 and in Japan with masters (where all martial arts originate) not some studio in USA

8 Years Later - Still Not Winning

from Wikipedia ,your source that you clearly didn't read properly

8 Years Later - Still Not Winning

lots of sources mention it. I have found issues on Wikipedia before. you can't take one source as truth on the net. there is also many videos of him training and demonstrating the art (it's not just a Holywood trick). I don't recall ever seeing onw ...

8 Years Later - Still Not Winning

he is a 7th-dan black belt in aikido

8 Years Later - Still Not Winning

I have no preference for either but seagal is also a retired martial artist, whether van dam makes fun of him is irrelevant and we will never know who would win. the 2 have different fighting styles and there isn't much on the net showcasing the 2 ...

8 Years Later - Still Not Winning

I guess we will never find out but here is an interesting video about seagal style vs mma expert url

8 Years Later - Still Not Winning

only if you wait for your stop to be hit

5% risk per trade?

isn't vandam just an actor while seagal actually knows hand combat. so are you saying pretend to be a trader vs actually being a trader?

8 Years Later - Still Not Winning

I trade 2 strategies that work together and separately 1) macro + news 2) momentum shifts

What's your system?

all trading involves costs. if a trader can cover these and remain profitable then what's the big deal?

Are trading costs the main reason of losses in trading?

I don't hold overnight so don't pay swaps and it isn't hidden costs, its on every brokers website in black and white.

Are trading costs the main reason of losses in trading?

a fruitless endeavour

Are trading costs the main reason of losses in trading?