- Search Metals Mine
-
maximinus replied Dec 9, 2015I dont take side, I never was part of any gang and it will not change. When I disagree I state it idem when I agree. Nothing personal. I wish you the best.
EURUSD
-
maximinus replied Dec 9, 2015Ok sir, you are right but may I add that stating that "In that case no one knows..." is not correct. I'd say Allmost everyone ignore the real reality less the few liars.
EURUSD
-
maximinus replied Dec 9, 2015That's not because something is printed in a newspaper or shouted in a news show that's true or conform to the reality. Just my 2 cents.
EURUSD
-
maximinus replied Dec 8, 2015I think that what Shiv999 meant is that before WTO Uruguay round there was no meaningful/substantial globalization, so that comparing india's export before and after 199X may not be really pertinent.
EURUSD
-
maximinus replied Dec 7, 2015Humm, I'm not really convinced of the role of the masses in changes, evolutions, revolution, progress etc. Those who want to form their own opinions have more tools at their disposition than at any time previously.
The Club!
-
maximinus replied Dec 7, 2015This info is not confirmed nor denied, the russian defense ministry is silent ant that is very eloquent. If true, that's a very brilliant and well calculated nato's move to call the russian bluff if any. url
The Club!
-
maximinus replied Dec 6, 2015Is what is published or not by western medias is important? I don't think that VP, Lavrov, Shoygu and Co take their decision based on what is validated by the west. That was true at the time of Boris Yeltsine but that is fortunately over now. So, I ...
The Club!
-
maximinus replied Dec 6, 2015After the publication of this video they stopped denying it but telling that it's insignificant

The Club!
-
maximinus replied Dec 2, 2015I Agree, We are in an the absurd and total cynism. Paradoxically, I'm more optimistic than ever : it cracks inside Nato. Greek Defense Ministry said that the SU did not violate Turkish airspace and that F16 violated the syrian airspace. Nato is not ...
The Club!
-
maximinus replied Dec 2, 2015THANKS for the shorthand record. It helped me to get a clear picture of what happened. Pentagon rejects Russian evidence
url Sure those US Generholes are expert in false evidenceThe Club!
-
maximinus replied Nov 27, 2015In truth, I'm not surprised. Even a 5 year kid know that it's impossible to scramble a fighter and shoot an enemy aircraft that violated the airspace for 17sec only unless it is a well mounted ambush. VP gave some hint on this during his press ...
The Club!
-
maximinus replied Nov 26, 2015So who had golden finch in his fingers few days ago and all over his face today? Have you seriously thought that you were up to my level, my capacity and qualified to comment on such a complexe issue as that of the russian jet shooted by the turkish ...
EURUSD
-
maximinus replied Nov 24, 2015Of course, this is how this case will be decided, each parties will have to demonstrate that there was/was no violation of airspace, despite what the foxnews et al. parrots/pundits are saying here.
EURUSD
-
maximinus replied Nov 24, 2015Ah, sure coming from one (not you of course and no need to precise but it's better to do so) who launches BS on this matters and was caught several times, not really surpised. Thanks for the explanation.
EURUSD
-
maximinus replied Nov 24, 2015They can, but it doesnt matter in a strictely legal point of view. What matters is 1) establish that there was (or no) violation of airspace; 2) usual warning have been given; 3) how the intruder reacted to the warnings; 4) when and which point the ...
EURUSD