- Search Metals Mine
- PropDude1234 replied Jun 13, 2025
Prop traders want to pay the lowest price. That is what they get for doing so.
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jun 3, 2025
5%ers said everyone trades 'true real funds' when funded from 17:00: video
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jun 2, 2025
I interpreted 'revenue' it more widely than just live flow. I understand they have an extensive property / investment portfolio so assumed it included that rather than sending individuals to / hedging flow in the the real market.
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jun 2, 2025
I doubt FTMO are that profitable these days without taking some drastic action. The two-step static is the most abused / targeted by cheaters. A couple of years ago the CEO and CTO of FTMO said 80% of their rev comes from failed evaluations. At the ...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied May 31, 2025
Reasonable video except where he says 'the risk is off the table' and there's 'no risk exposed' because his stops are breakeven. Little bit amatuer for someone who mentors to make such statements.
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied May 26, 2025
Apart from the millions of people who've bought prop accounts...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied May 26, 2025
Agreed. Offering Instant funding for very little should be a red flag. Although the props hardly are upfront with their instant funding rules.
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied May 26, 2025
Why are traders who are buying from cheap, race-to-the-bottom firms surprised when they get screwed over?
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied May 22, 2025
Offering the 40% payout. Was wondering if you accept and they have you sign a further agreement.
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied May 22, 2025
So what do they do if you accept? Try and get you into a confidentiality agreement?
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied May 21, 2025
I doubt MQ will move back into the US. The app store removal was a massive scare. They're not touching any link to the US when onboarding. Centralised exchange vs OTC. MFF were accused of being an RFED which is unique to CFD props. Also accused of ...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied May 18, 2025
Except for their website disclaimer that literally says the opposite (see attachment). Prop firms can't be regulated because they're not carrying out regulated activities, so they can't onboard MT5 in jurisdictions that have regulators. The solution ...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied May 14, 2025
I wonder if we'll see some props re-enter the US market.
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied May 14, 2025
I find it unlikely the CFTC would target a foreign entity over someone US-based like TFT. Assuming MFF is dismissed, they haven't clarified whether the prop model is unlawful in the US. By that I mean the things that apply universally to props, ...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied May 14, 2025
Thanks for your view as always. Tech provider seems on step removed so less probable to me unless they're actively involved in the fraud, which I doubt. Do you share you X profile on here, out of interest?
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied May 14, 2025
The question is what the CFTC will do now. If the case is dismissed (the judge doesn't have to implement the recommendations), it doesn't clarify the law and whether MFF were breaking it. Does that mean the CFTC will hit another target? The ...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied May 12, 2025
What defines them as 'broker backed', out of interest.
Prop Firm Hub