Yes, that seems contradictory to me, too. So I don't know what the problem is. All the best to you too!

Trading for a living

Haven't MFF demonstrably cheated their customers? I wonder who will trust them again.

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

Pro or Pro+? Wouldn't it be easier for you to trade a 100k or 150k account instead of five separate smaller accounts? I'm asking because in the case of Tradeify, you wrote that you lost all five accounts at the same time. Were those the same trades ...

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

What type of account do you have at TPT?

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

Thanks, good post. I would argue that our behavior is far more important than knowledge and intelligence in financial success. I know people who are completely stupid and have no in-depth knowledge of most of the things they do, and yet they earn a ...

Trading for a living

My DARWIN risk multiplier is at 0.50 if that’s what you mean. So 1% return/drawdown is 0.5% for my DARWIN.

darwin discussion

Correlation doesn’t seem to be a problem for permanent allocations. As far as I understood, you can have multiple DARWINS, all running the same strategy/system while getting paid the performance fees for all your DARWINS and permanent allocations.

darwin discussion

Not sure what you mean?

darwin discussion

I just looked again and think it's very unrealistic for me to get the capital I need with one DARWIN to really live off it (100k/year). Even if I were to achieve an average return of 2% per month with my DARWIN, I would need almost 2.8 million AuM. ...

darwin discussion

Yes, there's nothing wrong with that. Personally, I like to keep things simple and manageable. Trading too many accounts with too many companies would be less productive for me.

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

Thanks for your answer. I understand. Yes, your approach to prop companies has now become clear to me. I think you can do it that way, but there are other ways too. Personally, I would rather try to trade as few accounts with as few providers as ...

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

And yet you find the time to comment on me. You're not exactly the brightest bulb in the box?

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

Thanks for the link. That looks interesting and similar to the ORB approach I'm currently pursuing, but without directional bias. I'll take a closer look at it in the next few days. I think I stumbled across this study before. I'll take a ...

Trading for a living

This is of course a real limitation. ONLY 10 evaluations you can purchase PER month? Why do you have to buy more than 1? Because you lost your account after a short time? Sorry, but can't follow that. In my opinion it is absolutely unnecessary to ...

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

Thank you for your great answers. Structured – by that I mean that certain routines suit me. I am aware that there is a lot of noise in the markets, so my philosophy is not to try to make predictions, but rather to pursue a statistical approach ...

Trading for a living

If you've met all the criteria to receive a payout, they should send it to you without any further questions. Period. Furthermore, there shouldn't be any problems at all with further orders as long as you haven't already exceeded the maximum number ...

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

Interview. There you go. This prop firm will come up with all kind of excuses not having to pay. I can’t understand why you even consider dealing with so many dubious prop firms. Why don’t you just work with 5ers, FTMO or Topstep? You also wouldn’t ...

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

Please Monty. You’re posting here every day how you’re basically gambling (excuse me, trading with sound risk management and no gut feeling decisions) trying to „milk“ these discount cheap ass props firms following all their „hot deals/offers“ but ...

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

Maybe a total loss is unlikely but I wouldn’t say it’s not possible to happen. Otherwise please tell me why it shouldn’t be possible? A 95% chance of something not happening isn’t a 100%. There are DARWINs on the platform with well over 80% max. ...

Prop Firm Hub 2.0

Thank you. Yes, that's right. However, I wonder from an investor's point of view how it helps them to know that there is still a 5% chance of losing more than 6.5%, or in case of doubt, 100%. I understand that Darwinex cannot carry out active risk ...

Prop Firm Hub 2.0