- Search Metals Mine
-
nubcake replied May 5, 2010i dont know you well enough to dislike you enough to impose fibs on you
Why 61.8%?
-
nubcake replied May 5, 2010and why not at any other level? that is the main question i have, really. *shrug* don't know. too tired to put the head into it, but if it doesn't make immediate sense (which fibs do not) to me then i'm not buying. there's a lot of noise on ...
Why 61.8%?
-
nubcake replied May 5, 2010maybe, but more so that there are better reasons for someone who is going to actually send volume through forex to do so than because it hits a fib level. yes, under-trading. can't think of a better way to describe it, and don't want to get into the ...
Why 61.8%?
-
nubcake replied May 5, 2010in the kitchen where she belongs! personally i'm not convinced there is such a thing as probabilities in markets, at least not in the sense that the term is used 99.99% of the time in forums and which you have used it. i guess it's the same question ...
Why 61.8%?
-
nubcake replied May 5, 2010yeah sure, but can anyone tell me why they think there might be more of one or the other? is it because some pretty indicator says so? why doesn't someone come up with a tool to represent Pi or something? I'd give it a trial go just for the fun of ...
Why 61.8%?
-
nubcake replied May 5, 2010probably. but all i've noticed is a lot of hearsay and guessing. nothing has rocked my world so far and it's all been fairly-much the usual same old forum noise.
Why 61.8%?
-
nubcake replied May 5, 2010until the day comes that a trader can clearly define WHY their 'tools' work then all they are doing is e-wanking while it works, and then keeping quiet when it doesn't. "you need to draw the fibs correctly", err ok then how does one draw them ...
Why 61.8%?
-
nubcake replied May 5, 2010did a couple of trades last night and all does seem a world better than before. certainly not instant instant but if it takes a second or 2 to process then i'm happy considering it used to take up to a minute. might have just been lucky, so time ...
GoMarkets Discussion
-
nubcake replied May 4, 2010and now i know what the text version of beating a dead horse is like. this thread can safely go to the loony bin. why fibs, why sma, why ema, why why why.... why not? gives people something to argue over. ney.
Why 61.8%?
-
nubcake replied May 3, 2010interesting how much disagreement there is. if it was clear-cut then the arguments would be clear-cut. honestly this is like a religion debate.
here's a thought that's just CRRRRRRAAAAZY.... maybe the secret behind all the magical and ...Why 61.8%?
-
nubcake replied May 3, 2010grow up. no one owes you anything so stop feeling so entitled. you got 2 months of data and mt4 for what cost again?
GoMarkets Discussion
-
nubcake replied May 2, 2010if someone said that 0.729 and 0.222 were magical numbers... made a tool... used this tool as y'all currently do with fibs... would they then still be making the same arguments as currently being made. "you need to put them in the right spot" "you ...
Why 61.8%?
-
nubcake replied May 1, 2010by posting off-universe. this thread has nowhere left to go so for all the "oh boohoo this thread isn't on topic" have missed the point that the topic has been done and ended. The answers have been given. the rest is pure fun, clearly. it was a ...
Why 61.8%?
-
nubcake replied May 1, 2010lol. i could not care less about people and their charts. how boring. so why use a tool that requires discretion when you could just eyeball the chart in the first place? can you not see roughly where 61.8 lies on a chart without a magical fib tool? ...
Why 61.8%?
-
nubcake replied May 1, 2010for all your posturing i now realise this isn't he first time i've caught you speaking from the wrong end. it's not something i'm doing on purpose, but when i see something so blatant it's not my fault it's from the same person. you talk the talk ...
Why 61.8%?