- Search Metals Mine
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 14, 2024
There were, IIRC, 26,000 people who went to the 'live' accounts. Plenty of scope for naughty behaviour. As I wrote previously, there was a discussion about anyone over 5% being put on a harder live group. In terms of whether the people they really ...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 13, 2024
Or I'm (as one user) just here for a discussion. I think Futures props are far worse than CFD ones and would prefer the CFD ones to last and still be offered to US citizens. Not everything has some hidden meaning / agenda or conspiracy. It's strange ...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 13, 2024
A long time ago and it seemed like pretty normal CFD execution to me. Not that I'd attach much weight to my experience as it's anecdotal.
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 12, 2024
So they say. How do we know that for a fact? Seems odd to take what MFF say on face value about one thing when they've lied about other things. They discussed (the CFTC have the correspondence which is in the court documents) anyone making over 5% ...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 12, 2024
It sends a message to other props firms that you shouldn't totally misrepresent their business, create conditions with the intention to increases failure rate, raises the barriers to entry, likely makes partners (banks / payment providers etc) ...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 12, 2024
Futures brokers are essentially neutral and are executing your trades on a centralised exchange to buy and sell the contracts on that exchange. They're not the broker's contracts, and they charge a commission for doing so. They don't really care how ...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 11, 2024
Yes, a Futures broker doesn't care, where as OTC CFD do.
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 11, 2024
I thought it went out saying it was general description of the fundamentals. With a more nuanced look, of course there needs to be some success in order for there to be promotion / marketing, but given how the average retail traders thinks / ...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 10, 2024
Not now it's industry standard and FTMO led the pack with it. Shame they didn't blaze that trail when they had the chance. May have resulted in fewer frozen houses.
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 10, 2024
At least their proposed disclosures will be clear if they're ever able to go back in business:
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 10, 2024
The sample size (under 100) of who went to the live market is so low it's hard to draw any conclusions. It's quoted 70% of the <100 who went to live did worse. Secondly, what was the selection methodology? Was it a sample of people who had managed ...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 10, 2024
Brokers regulated by tier 1 regulators (FCA, ASIC etc) do not do what MFF did when it comes to false / fraudulent statements. The licences are publicly available and the T&Cs will give full disclosures. Some dodgy offshore broker may be different, ...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 10, 2024
MMF told their customers they'd be trading live capital. Part of their issues. You raise a good point, you'll just end up with shady off-shore practitioners if there's no path for legitimate businesses to operate / be regulated.
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 10, 2024
Telling people they'll be in the live markets when it was almost certain they wouldn't be was a total lie relating to the financial markets. Imagine if the CME did that with their Futures offerings. Or a broker like Dorman. The very minimum the ...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 10, 2024
I'm not connected with anyone on here. I searched for 'FTMO no longer taking US clients' and at the time I searched this topic ranked highly so I clicked it. I saw it was an interesting discussion and since I have some industry experience decided to ...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 10, 2024
If there are integrity matters and other concerns then they obviously should be addressed. However, that's separate and different from suggesting the regulator that regulates the financial markets shouldn't have the scope to take action against ...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 10, 2024
It'd be a bit strange if the CFTC wasn't able to take action against companies making 'false statements' (AKA total, deliberate lies to attract customers) about the financial markets they regulate.
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 10, 2024
It's not. It's often admirable to see success. It's a little different when that person is lying to all his customers.
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 10, 2024
Their setup was clearly incompetent. Nearly all CFD flow (with actual CFD brokers) is warehoused / internal / B-booked. You don't see the likes of IG making various groups to deal with X, Y and Z. A better option which would have taken care of the ...
Prop Firm Hub
- PropDude1234 replied Jan 9, 2024
MFF were paying out, but they were also lying and manipulating conditions (albeit the CFTC didn't quite represent it wholly accurately) whilst the CEO was buying multi-million USD mansions, Ferraris, Lamborghinis, Bugatis etc. They were, rather ...
Prop Firm Hub