That's regular MACD without signal & MACD line... image

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Absolutely, feel free to share the equity curve. If you’re comfortable, sharing a few basic stats alongside it (profit factor, max drawdown, longest win/loss streak, etc.) would be super helpful too. Not to critique, just to help set realistic ...

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Hit take profit .... image

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Here’s a more grounded breakdown of how this setup could’ve been approached — there’s no one “right” way, but some options were clearly better than others. Setup 1: Standard entry without any broader context — ended up hitting stop loss. Setup 2: ...

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Thanks so much for the thoughtful comment — really appreciate it. Totally agree on low-volatility environments. Reversion setups can just stall or fake out completely. But honestly, high volatility can be just as frustrating — price rips away and by ...

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Nice setup with divergence image

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Gold Trade Breakdown Trade 1 – Price crossed but didn’t close below the basis line. Personally, I would’ve avoided this one. But if you followed the rules strictly, it would’ve ended with a solid 2R gain. Trade 2 – No clear structure for placing the ...

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Perfect....

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Newyork session has given lot of clean setups today -- few of them are below, One is still running image image image

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

If you had held the trade while closely watching the TTM Squeeze, you could’ve easily bagged 5R. The opposite signal hasn’t fully confirmed yet, but price is clearly reacting around a point of interest we can see on the left — so it’s not a bad ...

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Good setups in Newyork session image image

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Another decent setup image

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Clean Perfect setup on Natural gas image

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

you're absolutely right — in a lot of cases, by the time TTM Squeeze gives the green light, MACD has already shown the momentum shift. That’s something I’ve noticed too. TTM acts more like a second layer of confirmation for me — not always timely, ...

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

I actually never used the 200 EMA myself, but if it helps you feel more confident with the setups, then stick with it. At the end of the day, whatever makes you more comfortable executing trades is what matters. Just make sure to backtest it ...

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

So as you can see, the RSI confirmation is currently set to 0 bars, meaning it has to align exactly with the initial signal. I usually keep it that way to keep the chart clean. However, in this particular setup, RSI confirmation came a bit later and ...

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Trade Breakdown As I’ve mentioned before, I personally don’t trade the London session. But for those who do, there were a few decent setups worth reviewing: Trade 1 – Price had already crossed and closed above the basis line before confirmation. ...

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Finally a decent setup on gold image

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based

Not gonna lie, didn't find a decent setup in Asian session...

(binned per thread starter’s request) reversionX: A Rule-Based