- Search Metals Mine
- 2,850 Results (1 Thread , 2,849 Replies )
- Capablanca replied 1 hr 25 min ago
I'm not so optimistic. I have not gone into the details of these new programs but I trust what Takisd said that they are probably easy to game as well. Never thought about that but I guess the futures ones, with the trailing stops, the consistency ...
- Capablanca replied 1 hr 30 min ago
No need to fight about AMP Margin. AMP has, most of the time, very low margins. During some events they increase significantly, which is normal. I called it restrict because it's a decrease of leverage. I think you all know what I meant even if I ...
- Capablanca replied 1 hr 41 min ago
I'm not talking about one single bet. Anyone can also pass a challenge in just one attempt. My point is that in casinos you cannot win consistently because of the negative statistical value of their games, unless you cheat. While in props you can ...
- Capablanca replied 6 hr ago
Don't confuse cheating with gaming. Nobody can win in a negative statistic value casino game without cheating. That's pure math. And all of the casino games are negative value, except blackjack when you count cards (and hedge is very thin when they ...
- Capablanca replied 9 hr ago
Isn't Bulenox the one that doesn't allow to withdraw the buffer ? I may be confusing but I thing there was one prop not allowing it.
- Capablanca replied 9 hr ago
Gaming a program is slightly different from cheating it IMO.
- Capablanca replied 9 hr ago
The only reason to keep it in pro (while 100% profit split is yet in place) is if people can get higher leverage (if they want to use it). AMP Futures have pretty good leverage but they restrict in some news.
- Capablanca replied 30 hr ago
Top Step is going to announce something on Monday url
- Capablanca replied 30 hr ago
Your biggest "mistake" was to make well above 10K in TFF. They are known for creating a lot of troubles and sometimes not paying >10K, finding excuses in IPs, trading history, rules, fabricating evidence, changing the past, etc. Knowing that these ...
- Capablanca replied 31 hr ago
OK, OK, now I understand mate. I just found strange that you were making that question. It not that you're a noob in all this stuff so something had to be behind the question. Now I understood it. ------------------ Btw, on the capped daily profit ...
- Capablanca replied 34 hr ago
Is this a telegram group or such ? What's in it for them to disclose the method ? Do you belong to some sort of pool ?!
- Capablanca replied 34 hr ago
A lot of discussions here, specially the ones about futures, have been around static DD or trailing DD. And knowing that you're a veteran here I don't understand your doubts about static or trailing. Honestly I'm even unsure if your profile wasn't ...
- Capablanca replied May 3, 2024
I believe others will also copy E8 in this daily profit cap. If they were real props it would be stupid to cap profits. But knowing this is a videogame industry that can't manage risk, it makes sense. Even if someone had 22 winning trading days in a ...
- Capablanca replied May 3, 2024
That's a pitty. I wanted to milk Blue a bit more.
- Capablanca replied May 3, 2024
I think that existing 1 step challenges were all trailing DD (except Finotive), which didn't make the product very attractive (and I guess it was a nightmare for support to explain to dumb people what a trailing DD means). Sounds that now a new ...
- Capablanca replied May 3, 2024
E8 launched a static 1 step challenge with 2% daily loss. Now suddenly it will be a barrage of 1 steps static coming to the market. MFFx already launched after e8 and lark guy is also asking opinions in twitter. It'll be the next big trend in the ...
- Capablanca replied May 3, 2024
And then you are unlucky to win on the one not paying
- Capablanca replied May 3, 2024
Not impressed by the name, honestly. Let's see.
- Capablanca replied May 3, 2024
I don't have any experience with them but if Matt is saying that they will be paying it's probably safe. It would be very silly not to pay after that announcement. That would be a death sentence to MFFx (which seems to be already in the death row).
- Capablanca replied May 3, 2024
Swift funding was having a lot of payments delay and denials. MFFx just absorbed them. Announcement from Matt url