-
Eurozone business activity rises at fastest pace in three months
The rate of growth in eurozone business activity hit a three-month high in February, according to provisional PMI® survey data. The improvement in the rate of expansion was most notable in the manufacturing sector, where output increased at the fastest pace since August last year. Meanwhile, the upturn in overall new orders remained muted and was unchanged from January, and companies again showed a reluctance to hire additional staff. The rate of input cost inflation quickened for the fourth month running, although output charges were raised at a slightly softer pace than in January. Business confidence also eased, ... (full story)
- Comments / Top
- Subscribe
-
Related Stories
*TRUMP’S GLOBAL TARIFFS STRUCK DOWN BY US SUPREME COURT 
Supreme Court of the United States: Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, President of the United States The question presented is whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) authorizes the President to impose tariffs. See 91 Stat. 1626. Shortly after taking office, President Trump sought to address two foreign threats: the influx of illegal drugs from Canada, Mexico, and China, Presidential Proclamation No. 10886, 90 Fed. Reg. 8327; Exec. Order No. 14193, 90 Fed. Reg. 9113; Exec. Order No. 14194, 90 Fed. Reg. 9117; Exec. Order No. 14195, 90 Fed. Reg. 9121, and “large and persistent” trade deficits, Exec. Order No. 14257, 90 Fed. Reg. 15041. The President determined that the drug influx had “created a public health crisis,” 90 Fed. Reg. 9113, and that the trade deficits had “led to the hollowing out” of the American manufacturing base and “undermined critical supply chains,” id., at 15041. The President declared a national emergency as to both threats, deeming them “unusual and extraordinary,” and invoked his authority under IEEPA to respond. He imposed tariffs to deal with each threat. As to the drug trafficking tariffs, the Pre *SUPREME COURT RULES 6-3 AGAINST TRUMP ON TARIFFS Supreme Court does not address eligibility for tariff refunds.
Supreme Court of the United States: Learning Resources, Inc. v. Trump, President of the United States The question presented is whether the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) authorizes the President to impose tariffs. See 91 Stat. 1626. Shortly after taking office, President Trump sought to address two foreign threats: the influx of illegal drugs from Canada, Mexico, and China, Presidential Proclamation No. 10886, 90 Fed. Reg. 8327; Exec. Order No. 14193, 90 Fed. Reg. 9113; Exec. Order No. 14194, 90 Fed. Reg. 9117; Exec. Order No. 14195, 90 Fed. Reg. 9121, and “large and persistent” trade deficits, Exec. Order No. 14257, 90 Fed. Reg. 15041. The President determined that the drug influx had “created a public health crisis,” 90 Fed. Reg. 9113, and that the trade deficits had “led to the hollowing out” of the American manufacturing base and “undermined critical supply chains,” id., at 15041. The President declared a national emergency as to both threats, deeming them “unusual and extraordinary,” and invoked his authority under IEEPA to respond. He imposed tariffs to deal with each threat. As to the drug trafficking tariffs, the Pre *SUPREME COURT RULES 6-3 AGAINST TRUMP ON TARIFFS Supreme Court does not address eligibility for tariff refunds.
Business activity growth in Germany’s private sector accelerated to a four-month high in February, reflecting improved performances in both manufacturing and services, the latest ‘flash’ HCOB PMIŽ survey results showed. The upturn continued to be supported by stronger demand for goods and services, with inflows of new work rising for the fourth time in the ...
February data indicated that UK private sector output growth gained further momentum, supported by a robust and accelerated upturn in new work. Solid rates of business activity expansion were seen in both the manufacturing and service sectors. However, employment numbers decreased for the seventeenth successive month, led by another marked reduction in the ...
