- Search Metals Mine
- 48 Results
- ph3onix replied Sep 7, 2011
Google can help you to find answers on your questions The book is "Mastering Elliott Wave by Glenn Neely" you can find it on Amazon. But you should better start from classic EWA, and your classic EWA knowledge should be deep to begin work with ...
- ph3onix replied Sep 6, 2011
I said. You should read posts carefully, because we only can see 1650 if triangle was forming. Triangle ALSO was SECOND idea, and first preferred idea was FLAT. I wrote - if FLAT is forming - we WILL SEE NEW HISTORIC HIGS or high near 1900 soon. ...
- ph3onix replied Sep 2, 2011
Well while talking about Flat scenario, we already know targets and possible dates, so you already know all you need the problem now - type of wave-b is unknown and we can't determine maximum and minimum requirements. Also gold reaction today is ...
- ph3onix replied Sep 2, 2011
Its reverse alternation triangle, and it might be there. But on our gold chart there is no reverse alternation. Anyway now we should assume triangle scenario should be dropped and flat scenario becomes the last one.
- ph3onix replied Sep 2, 2011
Neutral also wrong idea. The ONLY triangles where wave-e could explode and break a-c trend line deep - are the expanding triangles.
- ph3onix replied Sep 2, 2011
Then probably you wrong Its not a triangle anymore... In contracting triangles wave-e can't break a-c trend line as much as we see now... We have to choice again previous Flat scenario.
- ph3onix replied Sep 2, 2011
Prepare yourself for a thrust. If triangle is forming - today (possible with payrolls) we will see next one powerful move in Gold. There are two ways to trade triangle. First - is trying to catch top of triangle (sell-limit from 1842). Second - is ...
- ph3onix replied Sep 1, 2011
Usually in Flats wave-a = wave-c by size and time, so if triangle is wave-b of the Flat wave-c should take same time as wave-a (about 3 days), but in case we're expecting gold to make a new historical highs, wave-c of this flat can be a terminal ...
- ph3onix replied Sep 1, 2011
Okay, so idea about Triangle makes now more sense than idea about Flat. Here is updated chart with same triangle. As we can see triangle is developing well, and soon (later today, or tomorrow) we can expect triangle to complete. If so - bearish ...
- ph3onix replied Sep 1, 2011
You can read Mastering Elliott Wave book by Glenn Neely, president NEoWave Inc. url you can find a lot of information here. Beware - NEoWave is advanced technique and before start using it, you better understand common principles of EWA from other ...
- ph3onix replied Aug 31, 2011
Nothing changed. We are still in same situation. While gold moving near 61.8% retracement chances gold is making triangle growing up. If you are short keep your stop above 78.6 retracement. If you are long - keep your stop at the lowest point ...
- ph3onix replied Aug 31, 2011
Lol )) you better shut up, because he can back to this thread and next 30 years we will hear about his 30 years expirience Let bulls be in only-bulls-gold-thread-even-gold-is-not-in-bull-market
- ph3onix replied Aug 31, 2011
The red-dashed line is the possible price future movement projection.
- ph3onix replied Aug 31, 2011
Right, if triangle is forming - thrust will be bearish. Also there is a chance that thrust will be very powerful!
- ph3onix replied Aug 31, 2011
Not exactly... I wrote that there are two possible options for current wave. First is the Flat, second is Triangle. Flat is preferred, but Triangle is also not dead... If price will consolidate near 61.8% next few days, or make a drop till 1811 we ...
- ph3onix replied Aug 31, 2011
The person who claims was beeb. He already got some bullets about his ego beeb is always saying about his experience and so on... But he is often right, with his channeling technics.
- ph3onix replied Aug 30, 2011
See my posts above... If we are talking about real logic wave rules - NEoWave is only the way to believe. Both possible counts are explained above
- ph3onix replied Aug 30, 2011
Then count is not looks right ))) your count idea gives absolutely another final result )))
- ph3onix replied Aug 30, 2011
The point is classic EWA does not works well... it ALWAYS allows you to have MANY ideas and Wave counts... NEoWave gives you only logical choice and finalized rules to understand what wave count is REAL...
- ph3onix replied Aug 30, 2011
According to NEoWave (most advanced EWA technic ever made) you wrong. On your chart wave-B is completed (around 61.8% of wave-A) in this case - ZigZag is forming. In Zigzags wave-B must take AT LEAST same time as wave-A (normally should take more ...