- History
Expected Impact / Date | Description |
---|---|
May 5, 2020 | The German Federal Constitutional Court is due to announce a ruling regarding the constitutionality of the ECB's Asset Purchase Programme, in Karlsruhe; |
Jun 21, 2016 | The German Federal Constitutional Court is due to announce a ruling regarding the constitutionality of the ECB's Outright Monetary Transactions policy (OMT), in Karlsruhe; |
Mar 18, 2014 | The German Federal Constitutional Court is due to announce a ruling regarding the legality of the European Stability Mechanism and Fiscal Compact, in Karlsruhe; |
Feb 7, 2014 | The German Federal Constitutional Court is due to announce a ruling regarding the constitutionality of the ECB's Outright Monetary Transactions policy (OMT), in Karlsruhe; |
Jun 12, 2013 | The German Federal Constitutional Court is due to announce a ruling regarding the constitutionality of the ECB's Outright Monetary Transactions policy (OMT), in Karlsruhe; |
Jun 11, 2013 | The German Federal Constitutional Court is due to announce a ruling regarding the constitutionality of the ECB's Outright Monetary Transactions policy (OMT), in Karlsruhe; |
Sep 12, 2012 | The German Federal Constitutional Court is due to announce a ruling regarding the constitutionality of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), in Karlsruhe; |
Sep 7, 2011 | The German Federal Constitutional Court is due to announce a ruling regarding the constitutionality of participating in the Greek aid package and European Financial Stability Fund, in Karlsruhe; |
-
- GE Constitutional Court Ruling News
However, the GCC warned that the ECB decisions on PSPP exceed its EU competences, and as a result Germany should seek to ensure adherence to the European integration agenda, work towards the rescission of acts not covered by the integration agenda and take suitable action to limit the domestic impact of such acts to the greatest extent possible. More specifically, the German government and parliament are required to take steps to ensure the ECB conducts a proportionality assessment, and they have the duty to continue monitoring the ...
The Governing Council received a preliminary briefing by the governor of the Bundesbank and by the legal department of the European Central Bank (ECB). The ECB takes note of today’s judgment by the German Federal Constitutional Court regarding the Public Sector Purchase Programme (PSPP). The Governing Council remains fully committed to doing everything necessary within its mandate to ensure that inflation rises to levels consistent with its medium-term aim and that the monetary policy action taken in pursuit of the objective of ...
post at 8:19am: German Finmin Scholz: Court Decision Essentially Backs ECB Purchase Program post at 8:17am: German Finmin Scholz: ECB Programme Is Not Monetary Financing Of States After German Court Hands ECB 3-Month Ultimatum To Justify Stimulus Scheme BUBA Can Take Part In Programme For Time Being post at 8:24am: German Finance Minister Scholz says they will make a decision on ECB's programme in June
Germany's top court has ruled that the European Central Bank's mass bond-buying to stabilise the eurozone partly violates the German constitution. The ruling relates to government debt worth trillions of euros bought by the ECB since 2015, but not purchases in the current coronavirus crisis. The Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe says there is not enough German political oversight in the purchases. Germany's Bundesbank carries the most weight in the ECB's decisions. Italy is among the countries most reliant now on ECB bond purchases ...
post at 4:14am: BREAKING: German judges party dismiss ECB QE case in 7-1 ruling. #EURUSD post at 4:15am: German Judges In ECB Case Say Some Actions Are Unconstitutional $EURUSD post at 4:15am: German Top Court Says ECB’s Bond Purchase Scheme Partially Violates Constitution $EURUSD post at 4:17am: German Top Court Says Some ECB Action Held Illegal, Not Valid In Germany -ECB Decisions Are Not Backed By EU TreatyECB decisions on the Public Sector Purchase Programme exceed EU competences In its judgment pronounced today, the Second Senate of the Federal Constitutional Court granted several constitutional complaints directed against the Public Sector Purchase Programme (PSPP) of the European Central Bank (ECB). The Court found that the Federal Government and the German Bundestag violated the complainants’ rights under Art. 38(1) first sentence in conjunction with Art. 20(1) and (2), and Art. 79(3) of the Basic Law (Grundgesetz – GG) by failing to take steps challenging that the ECB, in its decisions on the adoption and implementation of the PSPP, neither assessed nor substantiated that the measures provided for in these decisions satisfy the principle of proportionality. In its Judgment of 11 December 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has taken a different stance in response to the request for a preliminary ruling from the Federal Constitutional Court; however, this does not merit a different conclusion in the present proceedings. The review undertaken by the CJEU with regard to whether the ECB’s decisions on the PSPP satisfy the principle of proportionality is not comprehensible; to this extent, the judgment was thus rendered ultra vires. As regards the complainants’ challenge that the PSPP effectively circumvents Art. 123 TFEU, the Federal Constitutional Court did not find a violation of the prohibition of monetary financing of Member State budgets. The decision published today does not concern any financial assistance measures taken by the European Union or the ECB in the context of the current coronavirus crisis. Facts of the case: The PSPP is part of the Expanded Asset Purchase Programme (EAPP), a framework programme of the Eurosystem for the purchase of assets on financial markets. As set out in the reasoning communicated by the ECB, the EAPP is meant to increase money supply and intended to support consumption and investment spending in the euro area and ultimately contribute to achieving an inflation target of levels below, but close to, 2%. The ECB launched the PSPP with its decision of 4 March 2015, which was later amended by five subsequent decisions. Und
Released on May 5, 2020 |
---|
- Details